Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm gonna make this short quick and simple!

Just a few years ago, 13 sec passes were considered quick for a street car....

Are 12 second passes now overtaking that? Is a 13 second pass now not good enough?

Just want to get peoples thoughts on this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83058-are-12s-the-new-13s/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

13's are quick for a street car. But we are getting faster stock cars, which raises the bar and makes people want to spend a few extra bucks to get into the next bracket to stand out.

A stock GTST for arguments sake runs a 14.5, which compared to a stock 5 litre VS holden 15-16?

So we have a better setup in the suspension department, a driveline thats tough as nails and an engine that responds to modification like no other.

Cheers

Sumo

Best thread this week!

It's gonna be like this for a while to come but eventually, 11's will be it. Speak to the old old OLD Castlereagh boys about street cars racing and tell them your daily driver runs a 13.9 ET and they're usually amazed. You need to remember that 6-pack EH Holdens running 15's were way cool once upon a time.

Add that to the list of 13 sec factory cars coming out that are relatively common on the street, (Falcodores etc) and the bar gets raised that extra little bit.

As far as Skylines are concerned, look at what 20 something people on this forum alone have done with their mostly stock 33's on radials @ WSID and other tracks. 12's are the norm now.

Adrian

Speaking about Skylines only and specifically WSID which i've been attending on a weekly basis since the day it opened.

When it first opened an R33 GTS-T with a std turbo doing a low 13sec pass was quite amazing. Then only a year or so ago a couple of people cracked a 12.9sec with a std turbo. Now their are people doing high 12's with std turbo's which I never thought i'd see.

With modified Skylines a low 12 or high 11sec pass was astonishing. Now fairly standard GTR's are doing low 12's and modified R32/R33 GTR's are doing low-mid 11's without breaking a sweat !

It seems as though these days if you aren't doing a 10 something in a GTR or an 11 something in a GTS-t you just aren't cutting it.

Hopefully i'm back out at WSID before the end of the year doing mid-12's ... which is my goal at this stage.

I think it depends on the car involved. I think a 12 sec street car is fast, although a 13 second street FWD is very fast as they dont have the ET, but the mph. my old MX6 did a 13.7 et, but a 112mph trap speed. My freinds very close to stock GTiR (fuel pump, wound up boost thats it) did a 12.2 et with a mph of 111 trap speed. he also had a 60 foot of 1.6, where mine was 2.5 seconds.

So yes I think alot more cars are running 12s but I think it depends on the drive of the car, RWD, FWD, AWD!

Rhys

Yeah my goal is to cut a 12.4 at least in the next 6 months....

Then take it from there.

But there are alot of quicker factory cars coming out but like people have said back in 00' and 01' a 13 was quick, now its slow.....

My mate has a WRX wagon that does a 12.3 and that thing feels slow! I dunno what is going on these days!

I think it depends what circle you travel in.

I know a number of guys that are worrying about a cage.

A reasonably modded turbo car, but still street, is 11sec or quicker, & beleive me that's heaps cheaper & easier than an 15 sec. EH - & also much nicer to drive on the street.

Regards

Out of interest, my std turbo'd 33 GTS-t went 12.6 @ 107mph last sunday.

Damm, that's good. That mph is especially impressive for the std turbo as well.

Would you mind posting your splits (i.e 60', 330' etc) so I can do a comparison with mine? :)

I managed a 13.1 @ 103mph last Sunday with Std turbo which I was pretty happy with. I think i've still got a bit more improvement left in that time with the current mods once I improve my launches a bit more. I'm planning to go out again in the next couple of weeks and see if I can crack that illusive 12 on the Std turbo.

Damm, that's good. That mph is especially impressive for the std turbo as well.

Would you mind posting your splits (i.e 60', 330' etc) so I can do a comparison with mine? ;)

I managed a 13.1 @ 103mph last Sunday with Std turbo which I was pretty happy with. I think i've still got a bit more improvement left in that time with the current mods once I improve my launches a bit more. I'm planning to go out again in the next couple of weeks and see if I can crack that illusive 12 on the Std turbo.

What was your 60" times? 60 footers are a key to running a 12 with the standard turbo. I ran a 12.98 with a 2.02 60'. If you can get a sub 2.0, you should be home and hosed.

I also believe that it's all down to the people you hang around with, and how quick their cars are. If you're riding in a 11second GTR all day, then of course a 13 second S13 is going to seem slow. But to the general populous who drive Corollas, Astras etc etc ... the 13 second S13 is still damn quick.

What was your 60" times?  60 footers are a key to running a 12 with the standard turbo.  I ran a 12.98 with a 2.02 60'.  If you can get a sub 2.0, you should be home and hosed.

I was doing consistant 1.9 60" time's on all three 13.1 runs that I did on the day.

What mph did you run?

Also, did you shift into 4th before the finish line? I found that I was always just about on the rev limit just before the line and had to shift up to 4th. Could it be possible that perhaps that extra gear change is costing that additional tenth of a second? In hindsight, I feel as though the car would have enough in it to run in 3rd to the line. I might give that a try when I go back in the next week or so...

In reality, I know that a sub 13 is nothing special to write home about where others are running 11's, 10's etc. Although I still think a 12 with the std turbo is a good achievement (and realistic goal) so I'm gonna keep trying till I get it. Then perhaps I'll upgrade the turbo and go for 11's instead :D

I was doing consistant 1.9 60" time's on all three 13.1 runs that I did on the day.

What mph did you run?

Also, did you shift into 4th before the finish line? I found that I was always just about on the rev limit just before the line and had to shift up to 4th. Could it be possible that perhaps that extra gear change is costing that additional tenth of a second? In hindsight, I feel as though the car would have enough in it to run in 3rd to the line. I might give that a try when I go back in the next week or so...

In reality, I know that a sub 13 is nothing special to write home about where others are running 11's, 10's etc. Although I still think a 12 with the std turbo is a good achievement (and realistic goal) so I'm gonna keep trying till I get it. Then perhaps I'll upgrade the turbo and go for 11's instead :D

+

I ran 107mph, so looks like you could do with a few more mph. I was definately in 4th, 3rd can't go to 170kph.

When I got my car I always wanted to run a 12, not a 13.

My car is what I'd call a street car but I don't consider it quick. Just under 200rwkw with a nice power band and 1350kg I should crack into the high 12's with a decent launch.

I still don't really think that's that quick though... so yes I think 13 isn't cutting it (atleast for me).

Maybe it's fast and the furious influenced ... "I owe you a 10 second car" lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, there's a very minor drift left that happens a few seconds after letting go of the steering wheel, but not enough to bother me. Enjoying the car still!
    • Got you mate. Check your email!
    • I see you've never had to push start your own car... You could save some weight right now...
    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
×
×
  • Create New...