Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

just a quick question. I have an R33 GTS-T 93 Model M-Spec.

I only had this for 4 months & the previous owner told me that the handling of the skyline is hard( pwr steering not kicking) when the rpm is low but when it reached 2 1/2 or above rpm the power steering kicks in & the handling is good, he said its a safety features that all skyline have. So am i a sucker to this? Engine is all good no probs, just the handling is pretty heavy when rpm is low. Any suggestion on how to fix this or is this normal?

Any input would be much appreciated.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83302-help-needed-reg-handlingpwr-steering/
Share on other sites

Hi guys

just a quick question. I have an R33 GTS-T 93 Model M-Spec.

I only had this for 4 months & the previous owner told me that the handling of the skyline is hard( pwr steering not kicking) when the rpm is low but when it reached 2 1/2 or above rpm the power steering kicks in & the handling is good, he said its a safety features that all skyline have. So am i a sucker to this? Engine is all good no probs, just the handling is pretty heavy when rpm is low. Any suggestion on how to fix this or is this normal?

Any input would be much appreciated.

cheers

Load of bullocks!!! Mine seems to be fine at low and high rpm's, ie when parking, no dramas with steering!!!

If you have wide tyres it will get heavier.

What' the problem with heavy steering? ;)

the problem is u have to rev the car abit to turn the steering wheel.

its ok if its on 2000 rpm but from 0 -1000 its hard to turn & u have to rev it abit to be able to turn. i just wanted to see if this is normal to all skyline.

looks like its not.

i got wide wheels, must be the prob :)

I have 235 x 18 and mine, and its not heavy, quite smooth to be honest

What you were told by the pervious owner seems to be rubbish,

Check your fulid levels, and for leaks, also check the tension of the belt running the power stearing pump and its pulley. The belt may be loose or just the wrong size.

may just be something simple and easy to fix.

Rs,

David

Cheers for the reply guys.

i just had a word with my mech, & he said theres no circulation in the power steering fluid at all!!

i just bought a pump, so i hope this would fix it.

cheers for the reply guys. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...