Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

she  reckons they did it on a air strip so room wasnt an issue, i just wouldnt beleive that the auto trans and let alone a 1600 would be able to push the car that farr, top gear in an auto would be redlining before it got up to 230 even wouldnt it? and it looked like a stock car pretty much...

They got a tow from a plane taking off. :lol:

Lets kill this one off right now, I don't have my Honda gear ratio chart with me, but from memory the manual B16A does 27 kph per 1,000 rpm. So 280 kph would be 10,370 rpm. So it's IMPOSSIBLE :)

But wait there is more ;)

If I remember rightly the auto is 8% shorter geared, so that would mean 11,200 rpm at 280 kph :lol:

:) cheers ;)

Edited by Sydneykid
whats a r32 gtrs stop speed btw?

I don't have my gear charts for Skylines with me either, again from memory 275kph = ~8,500 rpm. If it has enough power to push it there of course. At Philip Island we get to around 265 kph on the main straight which is somewhat downhill, and that's with 380 4wkw

:) cheers :)

hey. Its 12.20am and just got back from a burn in my mates s2k. THAT can definately do 280.... We onli took it up too 250 before i asked him to back it off. Thats a h22 in there but...

We took his type r integra up too 240 as well without too much of a sweat so i rekon it could do 280 without too much hassle. BUT i believe thats a b18 or sumthing in there.

That being said, it would barely be able to do 280 without some mods so i definatley dont think that a b16 could come close.

***all done on a legitimate track**** none of that open road shit.....

hey. Its 12.20am and just got back from a burn in my mates s2k. THAT can definately do 280.... We onli took it up too 250 before i asked him to back it off. Thats a h22 in there but...

Interesting, the F20 turns clockwise and the H22 turns anti clockwise, so that 250kph was in reverse, right? ;)

:) cheers :D

Theoretical top speed for a R32 GTR is about 250km/h. Don't need a rocket scientist to figure out that a RB26DETT has more torque than a B16A engine. I don't care what aerodynamic coefficent a Intergra is it'll never reach 250km/h (unless a tornado is blowing wind in the right direction and plumetting down to earth from orbit, YES, it may reach 280km/h).

Just cause the speedo says, doesn't mean it can do!

true but a type r teg is not far off. i was in my mates and we got it to 240km/h which i call close and damn good for a 1.8.

and yes i no at speeds like that that the speedo is not quite accurate but i am just saying what i have experianced. :P and civics have B16A integra B18C.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...