Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey pplz

Yesterday I went shopping for a sub and ended up talking to a few ppl about my r34 etc. one of the blokes ended up flutering my turbo to make the sequential noise which I think sounds quite nice. All he did was unplugged a hose from blowoff valve and put a screw in there. He said that for rollerbearing turbo its fine as he has r34 turbo on his r33 and hes done the same.

Should I keep it this way or is he wrong and this could damage my turbo among other things?

please someone let me know =)

thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/84109-fluttering-roller-bearing-r34-turbo/
Share on other sites

thanks for the links man but before you actually post them, read carefully the actual point i'm trying to put across... ROLLERBEARING turbo... flutter using a screw.. not fluttering cose of a problem with the engine.

as said, please let me know guys if this is a safe practice...

Flutter noise aka compression surge, the air going back through the turbo. Some people say its bad for your turbo, but there is no proven fact it is. My mate run no bov on his r33 for few years making that fluter noise and never had a problem. Yes it does slow the turbo down on gear changes, doesnt matter what kind it is.

Hey DarkZero, can you please elaborate on what was actually done? Perhaps with a photo if possible... this sounds quite interesting.

pavel, what do you mean by "slows the turbo down"?

Thanks all :P

if you dont have a BOV the turbo is pushing air into the motor at say 10PSI. When you take your foot off the accelerator the air has nowhere to go, so it tries to go back through the turbo hence the "HECTICT DOSES" of flutter.

It doesnt increase power, the air trying to go back past the turbo slows it down, therefore it could create more turbo lag because your trying to spin the turbo the opposite way.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...