Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im building a rb26/30 motor for a s14 silvia drift car, i want around 400-600hp, on a very tight buget,

i have engine fully build bar turbo setup,

i have a greddy twin td05/06 turbo manifold, but cannot find td turbos cheap

however i know a recker in chch nz, who has about 30x 16v rb20det around $100 each 4 me, turbos sitting there, i relise these are ceraimc, but i know they are reliable upto 14psi, twin 45v vg30 turbos may also be a option but too laggy?

these are defenlly bigger than std gtr twin tubos,

i was thinking of chopping off the wastegate system and welding up (converts to a 4 bolt dump pipe), maybee machining in larger intake/belmounths, and using the greddy type r wategate i have, ruuning twin 2.5" exh out side of car behind tyre and a single 2" 4 wategate,

run them oil cooled only i have done this on many t3 turbos to save hassle of lines)

and if anything happens simple remove the 2 housings and swap the internals

and replace the 3 bolt td flanges with 4 bolt t3 flanges, on manifold,

any one running twin t3's on any 3L motor, or even a 2.5??

what sorta flow would i expect from 12psi? enoguh for 500hp?]

i dont want a laggy engine, would it be using the tiny t3's i think they are .48 ar exh housings and 45v are .63 or .68?

so a 2l turbo would be used on a 1.5L engine,]

its either this package or a t78 greddy single which i have but thats prob going to be 4000rpm spool (compared to 3l supra) and i cannot find a t67 td06 60-1 t61 cheap,

also bonnet clearance is not a issue as a track only car, and a large hole in bonnet may help anyway with air temps

post-14949-1124512877.jpg

post-14949-1124512930.jpg

what are the specs of a greddy td05 (turbos used in original rb26 kit) a/ratios wheel sizes? they look smaller, but make 380rwkw on a 2.7l @ 18psi, (taken from a mag comparing turbos) i want it very responsive, when does a rb20det reach about 12psi boost?

Using 2 x RB20DET turbo's I would expect to be all in by at least 4000rpm.

I have one on the rb30det at the moment, using 9psi it made 176rwkw.

An RB20DET reaches 12psi by 3000rpm or there abouts.

The rb20det turbo on the rb30det I find will boost up to 12psi or so by 1700rpm. The probably is it doesn't go anywhere at the afr's state its leaning out. I suspect the stock N/A RB25 cams have too much overlap (8degree's) and the boost is simply being blown out of the exhaust at such low rpm.

At ~2000rpm it kicks hard makes 100rwkw and accelerates well. under 2000rpm with more than 6psi tends to feel like a flat spot. As I said.. I suspect the overlap is causing this problem.

I would think in twin form they will make probably a max of 550hp.

Edited by Cubes

o ok 4000rpm seams quite laggy, i have heard that 3L supras can spool a t78 greddy buy then, which at this stage is a more expensive but bettr option, any options on lag fro a t78 on a 3L? or anyone who had done the twin rb20det turbo conversion?

if u get 12psi buy 1700 on your 3l

wouldnt the both be 12psi at around 3400rpm?? 2x 1700 (twice the air flow)

With parallel twins you need to work on the exhaust flow rate of half the number of cylinders ie 3 cylinder 1300cc for each turbo because thats what feeds them .

Maybe you should consider the two RB20 Hitachi cartridges in the original RB 26's turbo housings and manifolds , at least it should then bolt together and look a bit more um .... functional .

Cheers A .

actually 1500cc each as its a 3l not a 2.6, do u think the exh housings will be too big for 1500 cc? i dont like the std low mount setups, and this manifold is already made,

also madiding turbos is expensive, a std oem 16v turbo is less than $100, thats why i tink them would be a good option,

i may be forced to use twin 45v vg30 turbos, as the supplier for the 2l turbo is being a ass, and wanting $250 each for them now, and i have vg30 ones 45v (similar to r33 rb25 turbos)

i have used a single vg30 turbo on rb30et & rb30dets before

they both started to spool at 900rpm (in 5th gear) and were at 10psi buy 2000rpm, with that in mind would 2x vg30 tubos start to spool at 1800rpm (900rm x2 or twice the airflow) and be at 10psi at 4000rpm??? is that to laggy for drifting? i think it could rev to 8000rpm (RB26 head)

what simiar twin turbo uprgrade on gtrs' have .63 .68 exh houings?

td05 td06?

hks/garret?

any better preduction on lag or spool times?

If you were to rev the sucker hard I would most definitely look at replacing the harmonic balancer with an ati one for example.

Otherwise.. good bye oil pump, bearings etc..

The VLT blokes have issues with their harmonic balancers up around the 6500rpm mark, broken oil pumps etc.

The import det harmonic balancers tend to have issues up around the 7500rpm mark. I'm not willing to find out though. :D

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The prices I’ve heard aren’t that bad 
    • Oh, I also meant to say that it is possible to use a venting BOV and restrict its outlet down so that it does vent enough to prevent the sututu, but vents slowly enough that the AFM doesn't see all the air at once and makes it easier to avoid stalling.
    • I'll go talk to my bank manager. Either that or my nearest western Sydney drug baron.
    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
×
×
  • Create New...