Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering, the relay in the bonnet for the "4wd" is that the one that essentially controls the transfer of the power to the front wheels?

I dont want to pull the fuse to dyno/burnouts or anything, i just prefer a car with more bias to the rear. I dont always want to be 2wd, 4wd is handy. I understand that there will always be residual pressure in the front wheels, but, if i am just using the car normal street driving with the relay pulled, would that damage my central diff?

Another question, and i know this might sound stupid, but what is involved in permenently making my stagea 2wd? Meaning, is it difficult to totally remove the front drive line/central diff?

If i do cut power to the front, via the relay, will have help remove understeer under power when going around corners?

Thanks for any help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/84959-pulling-the-fuse-to-make-rwd/
Share on other sites

it has been mentioned previously on here before i believe that the stagea like the r33 and r34 gtr have a slightly different awd system to the r32 gtr which does allow you to go into rwd but the others do not do this.

feel free to correct me if i am wrong

if you want more bias to the rear there is something that you can buy i dont know the name of it but sk or others will know its name that allows you to vary the torque from front to rear allowing you to have more power to the rears.

hope this helps

I know exactly what your talking about.

What i know of is that people pull the fuse for a few reasons. Burnouts, dyno runs etc. Things where the front wheels dont move at all.

I dont want to do things like that, i still want to drive around normally with the front wheels spinning, just no/miniumal power to them. The way i see it, there should be no wear on the central diff.

As for the controller, i know of it. TS Dancer its called, but it still doesnt transfer 0:100.

I was thinking that pulling the relay would be a cheaper way to get close to 5:95, but i just want to know if anyone KNOWS it will damage the car in any way?

Not sure if Stagea is the same as a 33GTR, but a member in Vic pulled the fuse and didn't disconnect the front shaft, resulting in a stuffed transfer case. Still worked but he stated that it felt worn/sluggish afterwards, he obviously wasn't a happy man. This was done about 18 (if not more) months ago, it never was the same, so he just got it reco'ed recently.

Let's atart off with some facts. Stageas don't understeer because they are 4wd. They understeer because Nissan designed the suspension system so that they would understeer, it's good for the Wallys.

The first job is to add some caster to the front, they don't have anywhere near enough. That fixes around 50% of the understeer. Then add some more rear anti roll, the rear stabiliser bar is too small by a lot. I added ~50% more anti roll to the front (24mm solid adjustable front stabiliser bar) and ~300% to the rear (24mm solid adjustable rear stabiliser bar).

Bingo, no more understeer.

Moving on to 4wd, all ATTESSA systems since 1994 have held residual hydraulic pressure on the clutch pack (there is no centre differential). Pulling the fuse or the relay simply stops the hydraulic pump from working. As long as you are not doing burnouts, dyno runs or drifting, this is not a problem for short periods of time. But the hydrailic fluid is not circulating (no pump remember) so the oil in the transfer case gets hotter and finally overheats. All of the components (clutch plates and intermediate plates) are still turning, they are still connected to the wheels and to the gearbox output shaft. So there is accelerated wear due to the extreme temperature.

You can buy an ATTESA controller (Duncan has them), which (even on 100% rear drive setting) still lets the hydraulic pump run and hence circulates the oil. But don't expect it to cure the understeer.

:D cheers :D

i was just going thru the service manual for something else but i came across this it states there are 2 methods to change the drive mode to 2wd.

1. remove air evacuation connector, and depress teh brake pedal 5times within 10 seconds after placing the ignition switch to ON position. At the same time the 4WD warning lamp will flash in the meter panel (twice in a second) to indicate it is in 2WD mode. To return the vehicle drive mode to 4WD, place the ignition switch to OFF position and connect air evacuation connector.

2. remove front propellar shaft.

page 20 of the manual...

Edited by muck

The first methoud works well cause I tested it when I had my Stagea up on a hoist. I've posted pics and a how too somewhere, it was a while ago now though..

But when I had the car on the dyno I got them to pull the front shaft out just to be on the safe side. The last thing you want is a $3000 bill to replace the clutch packs :D

Yeah I had that thread bookmarked but with this new change to invision it doesnt work, but Jay has a great howto for doing this, which also explains that it should not be done for long periods of time.

I personally would love to be able to do this when I take my beast out on some skidpans, but is not worth the potential damage it might do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...