Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure hwo useful this will be cause each car will support different amounts of timing depending on mods. When my car was tuned I think it ended up with 14deg of advance, anymore than that and it was pinging, this was at 14psi.

I think the only safe way to do it is have it dynoed, then they can change the timing while monitoring the pinging and do it safely.

See'ya:burnout:

I think alot of timing issues have alot to do with plug heat range too. I moved to 7s and it pings at 11psi (17deg) I 'll be moving back to 6s to get rid if the pinging.

Of course there are alot of other issues as well but this is one that not many people think about in relation to timiing.

Doc

At present I have probably about 30degrees advance or so. I tuned my timing 'on the road', boost set to 10psi (spikes to 12 every now and then).

Doctor: I agree with the plug thing, going to 6's is a hotter plug, less suited to high revs and boost than a 7 or 8. But, its the range I am using with a gap of 0.75mm.

If you can be bothered an '8' range plug just for the races is a good idea if you can be stuffed changing them before you go home (i can't).

30 degrees advance? shit that seems like alot.

I didn't realaise that plug heat range had so much affect, we just gapped mine real close, don't have any problems with misfires. We tuned mine for 14psi, therefore I think the timing has to go back to reduce the chance of detonation, the 2psi extra pumps alot more heat into the intake air and promotes pinging.

See'ya:burnout:

My car doensnt go anywhere near 25 degrees let alone 30??

Paul your wolf does your timing anyway so your base timing should always be 15 and you set your advance up thru the rpm ranges hey..

I think its better tuned on the road the dyno cant reproduce all senarios but is good as a start

Macka,

I'm just going by what Steve(SST) said, I have no idea what it is. The wolf totally controls the timing, we moved the CAS right back so it wouldn't affect anything then adjusted the timing from the computer. Still think 30 sounds high.

See'ya:burnout:

The basic rule of thumb with ignition is:

Base timing --- advanced, more if you run a lumpy cam or have poor cumbustion down low.

Top end timing --- Retards as load increases and combustion mixtures become leaner or more prone to detonate easily.

As if my car wanted to prove a point I got a little bit of pinging today, I suspect it was the last lot of fuel I put in was a tad dodgy.

30deg advance means that when the ecu decides to penalise you for too much air flow you have beat it to the punch. Thats the therory I have worked on and it seams to be right. However I am open to what others have to say.

The more advance you run the higher the potential power output, but it provides a narrow margin for error in tuning. The potential of pinging at high advancement is increased significantly, and therefore minor things like and increase in air temp or slightly dodgy fuel can lead to major problems.

I have mine tuned on the safe side, I'm after reliable power without the worry of detonation. When it was being tuned there was quite a bit more power to be had through advancement but it started to ping, so we backed the timing off a little.

See'ya:burnout:

You tend to find 'worked' cars run a larger amount of advance in the bottom rpm range and less advance in the top end. When I say less I mean less than a stockie motor, with more boost and and higher cylinder pressures there is less encouragement needed to start combustion at the right time for best power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have no hard data to report, but I have to say, having driven it to work and back all week, mostly on wet roads (and therefore mostly not able to contemplate anything too outrageous anywhere)..... it is real good. I turned the boost controller on, with duty cycle set to 10% (which may not be enough to actually increase the boost), and the start boost set to 15 psi. That should keep the gate unpressurised until at least 15 psi. And rolling at 80 in 5th, which is <2k rpm, going to WOT sees the MAP go +ve even before it crosses 2k and it has >5 psi by the time it hits 90 km/h. That's still <<2.5k rpm, so I think it's actually doing really well. Because of all the not-quite-ideal things that have been in place since the turbo first went on, it felt laggy. It's actually not. The response appears to be as good as you could hope for with a highflow.
    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
×
×
  • Create New...