Jump to content
SAU Community

Which car is better for drift  

38 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

ok well some newb on ns.com is running this poll and i think ns.com is very bias towards silvias so im just out to hopefully prove that a one model site will always favour the model its right is made for (i dont think that makes any sense but owell so hating silvia owners)

dale_8888
I am starting to save for either a 180SX or an R32.

Can people please give me the pros and cons of engines, setups and basic driftability?

and heres the link to ns to see the replys

Edited by drift_sil80
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86176-180sx-or-r32-skyline-gts-t/
Share on other sites

hehe I posted in the NS thread too, so I won't go into detail

180sx with SR20 over R32 GTSt with RB20DET. 180sx is easier to control for beginners, has better balance, better response in lower rev ranges, and most importantly gives more performance gain per dollar spent on it compared to the R32.

lol you want the truth? you can't handle the truth! I've owned a 180 and a r32 and driven versions of both in various levels of modification from stock to "off its head" (perks of working for an importer/being involved in the import community). The truth is the 180sx is a better beast to learn to drift in. I mean, name all the high profile cars (or even amature ones) that drift and run on SR20's and then do the same for ones that run on RB20's.

R32 shits all over the 180 in most other aspects though :O

R32 shits all over the 180 in most other aspects though  ;)

yeah fine ill believe you even though in what ive had / driven its skyline all the way for me only point i can make i guess is mick taylor getting rid of his 180 for a rb powered ceffy woot woot rb powar now delete this shit before you embarass me more, and all i wanted to do was stick up for my skyline :) kelly mckinnon :O

if you want a drift car then 180sx is the way to go

it's lighter, power delivery's more linear than the rb20

but i'd choose the r32 anyway, bettere interior, the rb20 revs and most importantly, it's got traction

the sound of the rb20, kicks sr20 and rb25's arses anyday

but i'd suggest you to test drive both before you buy, after all it's personal preference and whatever suits their driving style

i prefer the r32 but that doesn't mean other people do

if you want a drift car then 180sx is the way to go

it's lighter, power delivery's more linear than the rb20

but i'd choose the r32 anyway, bettere interior, the rb20 revs and most importantly, it's got traction

the sound of the rb20, kicks sr20 and rb25's arses anyday

but i'd suggest you to test drive both before you buy, after all it's personal preference and whatever suits their driving style

i prefer the r32 but that doesn't mean other people do

i tend to agree with most of that ( although where did Rb25 come into it??? lol )

im skyline mad...... but for a drifter i'd go the 180, they may not be pretty.... but the question is which is a better drifter not which is better looking yeah???

my 2 cents.

Hi JaR

the reason why i mentioned the rb25 is caus i sold the r32 for a r33, and i guess i'm starting to miss the r32 :cheers:

rb25's brutal, and VERY torquey, but you can play around with the revs very easily with the rb20.

don't get me wrong, rb25 has a smoother exhaust note which i like too, it's a bit quieter than the r32 and feels more refined

but the r32's just got that bit more racey feel in it, despite the fact that it's bit slower in the straight

each to their own, r33's definitely a great cruiser/tourer, but the r32's sportier

180sx? i'd say it's a fun car to drive

Edited by tkch55

i'd say the 180sx would be the better drifter, having a more even weight spilt. the 32 would probably be better suited for time attack. (this is just a theoretical assumption).

however, you could use both these cars for either application.

But the R33 leaves em both for dead :P

Edited by Frink

yeah you're right..

i've owned an r32 and driven 180sx. the r32 is definitely good for time attack, but i guess if you dump an rb25 in it and it will drift nicely

180sx on the other hand is a born drifter. i could feel the rear tyres starting to step out a bit quite easily

guess i'd be scared shitless if i have to drive that car in the rain

r32 on the other hand will just stick to the road, but when it reaches its limit, it doesn't throw enough signs at you before you lose it, span out a couple of times in the r32, but i guess HICAS was probably the culprit

but actually, i found the r33 to be a pretty good drifter too, courtesy of the torquey motor

Edited by tkch55

ok mate as a sttock ar 180 would prolly be better....but overall either car could be drifted the same depends on how good a driver u are....with a good suspension setup both are good rb has more top end and sr has more torque assuming it has lights mods...its up to you mate...if u wanna ask on an unbiased sit join secretdrift and ask...you wanted an unbiased opinion yet you've askedon a skyline site and a silvia...my pref is the 32 rbs are way cheaper to replace then sr's and in my opinion last longer...go the 32 mate...all the way...nice coilovers a two way and lights mods zoorst cooler cia and you'll be drifting like a champ if you can drive...good luck

Hi JaR

the reason why i mentioned the rb25 is caus i sold the r32 for a r33, and i guess i'm starting to miss the r32  :P

rb25's brutal, and VERY torquey, but you can play around with the revs very easily with the rb20.

don't get me wrong, rb25 has a smoother exhaust note which i like too, it's a bit quieter than the r32 and feels more refined

but the r32's just got that bit more racey feel in it, despite the fact that it's bit slower in the straight

each to their own, r33's definitely a great cruiser/tourer, but the r32's sportier

180sx? i'd say it's a fun car to drive

lol yeah i wasnt implying you were baggin R33's, i jst wanted to know where an Rb25 fit into a topic about R32's and 180's is all :).

180sx is a more fun car to drive though, its heaps lighter and fairly easy to get sideways... i.e better for drifting ;):)

and yeah R33's def. better cruiser :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...