Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I have recently upgraded my turbo and have my old setup for sale

- GCG highflow stage 2, approx 30k old, excellent condition, $1200 ono *SOLD*

- Trust style high mount manifold with some fairly big cracks starting to appear, modified with T3 flange, also has provision for external gate, repairable $150 ono *SOLD*

- Pirtek braided oils and water lines to suit $100 ono *SOLD*

- HKS adjustable wastegate actuator (original braket and new bracket to suit highmount) $140 ono *SOLD*

This was fitted to an R32 GTSt with rb25det

I'm located in sydney, would prefer sydney buyer so that all items can be inspected prior to sale.

Prefer cash or direct deposit

Attached is a (bad) shot of the installed setup where you cant really see too much. I will post up some pictures of the individual items tomorrow when the lights better (as my camera is a bit ordinary in low light)

Cheers,

Dave

EDIT: Added more pics

EDIT: Prices dropped

EDIT: All sold

post-2863-1126355904.jpg

post-2863-1126388275.jpg

post-2863-1126388302.jpg

post-2863-1126388323.jpg

post-2863-1126388345.jpg

post-2863-1126388368.jpg

post-2863-1126388389.jpg

post-2863-1126388409.jpg

post-2863-1126388434.jpg

post-2863-1126388463.jpg

Edited by BHDave

Sorry Nismo,i dont know if the lines will fit a 3540.

The oil and water fittings at the turbo are different sizes (the close up shot shows an oil and water fitting at the turbo as well as the barbed fitting that connects at the back of the head).

Cheers,

Dave

Gday abcent,

It's one of GCG's early stage 2 highflows rated at 480hp as opposed to the stage 1 which is 450. Basically its a fully rebuilt stock rb25 turbo with larger steel wheels, new cartridge and machined housings. I don't know the exact specs of the wheels or final a/r ratios

I only ever saw 199rwkw with this turbo on 12psi and about 10.5:1 A/F ratios. I later tidied up the a/f ratios bringing them back to about 12:1 and ran 14psi which felt alot quicker but never had it back on the dyno with this setup so can't say what sort of power it was making when the turbo came off.

Cheers

Dave

ah....thanks....sounds like the hi-flow I already have (which i also dont know the specs of but have the same description)...

so guess i'll keep looking for my upgrade...

if it helps the sale at all my hi-flow has managed 248rwkw at autosalon this year on 19psi

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...