Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I believe u made 218rwkw. :O

I need a dyno run printout to be able to dial in all the numbers so the graph looks right as no doubt you have picked up mid range as well.

Sky30,

Bl4ck32 was running 1bar, I was running stock rb20det actuator, i.e no boost control, boost would spike up to 12psi at ~2000rpm then tail off to 9psi by 4000rpm where it would go on to make peak power.

60km/h is approx 2200rpm. Its strange as if that is the case then 160km/h is only ~5900rpm. <scratches head>

I am going to need every ones tyre sizes to apply a correction.

Not to forget the diff ratio correction for both Natho's and the R33's slightly higher 4.11:1.

As I said prior, if your keen to compare off boost ignition maps i'm keen to do so. Depending how much works gone in to your maps you may pick a little off boost torque up. :D

Edited by Cubes
  • Replies 294
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Running 235/40/18's would act as if you had an ever so slightly higher diff ratio, so your top speed vs rpm will be higher than the others, as a result also your down low power will be down.

A good example of this is Natho's VLT, that runs a 3.45:1 diff ratio and the dyno stopped at 5100rpm yet his wheel speed is up there.

I think its wrong to compare bl4ck32 and my dyno's on the chart I posted prior. Something is just wrong with the speed vs rpm, possibly shaun fiddled with the wheel speed calibration. Don't know. :O

Edited by Cubes

Joel, can you add mine to that graph too, just for comparison sake, or post the xls file and I'll do it myself!

Also, I presume you're doing the calcs for the diff ratios to do a torque comparison at some stage. Should be interesting to say the least.

I also think the wheel speed on these dyno graphs aren't correct (I think Shaun mentioned that), as redline on my car in 3rd gear should be nearer to 200km/h than the 176 the run stopped at.

EDIT: Also, are those graphs all from the same day, or are there others there?

Edited by chops

The only dyno runs that were not done on the day were Bl4ck32's and mine.

I mainly put them in there for a comparison to Sky30's, how much of a difference the small stocker turbo's make to a 3ltr running a GT35R .82.

The wheel speed is always incorrect.. But what I do think has been modified since Bl4ck32 and I ran on the dyno is the wheel speed/roller calibration.

As I know 100% at 2000rpm mine was making 100rwkw.

Can you post up or pm me the first dyno run? I'm keen to see how the power curve looks. I had mine ran in v8 mode on D&T's dyno, the power curve resembled the lump style power curve of your second run.

Edited by Cubes

No time at the moment for wheel speed calcs.

Shouldn't be too far off as its only a 3.9:1 ratio, unlike Natho's 3.45:1, his run finished at 5100rpm.

Definitely looks strange how the run starts at 100km/h. What RPM was your run started at?

But it should be all road/roller speed related, every one drop their car in 4th and accelerate away.

post-382-1130395892.gif

Edited by Cubes

No idea what rpm it was started at.

That's a bit of a problem with autos though, if you give it full throttle at any lower speed it would drop back a gear, which is why I guess it starts so high up in rpm. Tuners with the software have the luxury of being able to lock the trans in 3rd gear.

First run was done in a different V8 mode though, not Shoot_6, so I don't think it will give the comparison you're after. I only have the hard copy, if you really want it I'll scan it and drop it to you.

If you want to do wheel speed things at a later date, redline on mine should be 6200 rpm, so you can work back from there. (approx 35.2 rpm per indicated kph, which would suggest approx 3500rpm starting point)

Hey dudes, we should get all our turbo's highflowed at once and get a cheap price because we are doing 3-4.

something i definately want to do, but unfortionately cant afford at the moment :)

The RB30 is nice but it also requires a nice manifold and decent sized turbo to prevent the top end nosing over.

It is nice though... I'm able to accelerate off the lights from idle and have it accelerate as hard from idle as a stockish (exhaust) LS1 Manual. Unsure if the edited ones have any more balls off idle or not.

So its definitely got some torque.

Wheelspin is a big issue for me at the moment, I put it down to worn subframe bushes causing axle tramp and a half stuffed diff that doesn't completely lock up, probably also causing part of the axle tramp.

God help it once its nudging 280. :D

Sky30's definitely sounds awesome on the dyno, I wouldn't mind grabbing either an audio file or small vid clip off some one at some time. :rolleyes:

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...