Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought the RB26 rods were the same (but thicker) but the RB26 crank was what you needed to stroke it? Also need RB26 pistons with that but that doesn't matter.

Rb25 will do the job I'm after so although I'd like the RB30 I don't want the hassle and I'm short of cash for issues so I'm sticking to something fairly safe. Might get 250rwkw with a rebuilt RB25 and no other mods.

Wont be many other tiptronic R34's out there to compete with that.

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sounds good Bob.

Dropping the comp ratio with a set of cheap cast pistons?

250rwkw is a walk in the park with a decent comp ratio.

9:1 is too highly strung for our fuel really, it can be done with long term reliability but one has to be carefull.

Edited by Cubes

since no one reply in my thread ill post it here :O

i think i got a similar problem to adams but my catch can is full atmo. I did the compression test and it seems all fine... the readings were ranging from 150 to 160. So what else could be the problem?...btw i noticed water in my overfilled catch can (milky colour) thats bad!..emptied it...but i know my catch can will fill up quickly again...any ideas?

since no one reply in my thread ill post it here :P

i think i got a similar problem to adams but my catch can is full atmo. I did the compression test and it seems all fine... the readings were ranging from 150 to 160. So what else could be the problem?...btw i noticed water in my overfilled catch can (milky colour) thats bad!..emptied it...but i know my catch can will fill up quickly again...any ideas?

take it to a mechanic.

since no one reply in my thread ill post it here :D

i think i got a similar problem to adams but my catch can is full atmo. I did the compression test and it seems all fine... the readings were ranging from 150 to 160. So what else could be the problem?...btw i noticed water in my overfilled catch can (milky colour) thats bad!..emptied it...but i know my catch can will fill up quickly again...any ideas?

If there is water in your catch can it would have to be a head gasket right...

anyone :P

since no one reply in my thread ill post it here :P

i think i got a similar problem to adams but my catch can is full atmo. I did the compression test and it seems all fine... the readings were ranging from 150 to 160. So what else could be the problem?...btw i noticed water in my overfilled catch can (milky colour) thats bad!..emptied it...but i know my catch can will fill up quickly again...any ideas?

If the catch can can just fills with water , you will find the oiul in the engine would be milky too . If thats the case it could be a leaking headgasket and or cracked head/block , h/gasket the most likely .

If your catch can fills with oil as well then the bottom end , rings most probably are worn .

I checked the oil cap after driving it...and NO milky look on the cap

YEh the catch can is filled with oil and water.... i noticed that around my bottom block...theres oil ...im not sure where its leaking from...i guess the head gasket

I checked the oil cap after driving it...and NO milky look on the cap

YEh the catch can is filled with oil and water.... i noticed that around my bottom block...theres oil ...im not sure where its leaking from...i guess the head gasket

By the sound of it the oil leak is the least of your problem .

Its normal to get some condensation in the oil catch can, but if it fills up with normal street driving your engine is not healthy . Empty it out and see how long it takes to fill up , how much does it hold ? how much water in it ? How much oil does the engine use ? is it fairly stock ? how much boost ? Stock pistons or forged ?

Adam ,

If you deside to pull your engine out and rebuilt it yourself let me know , as i have machine shop contacts to get the bore out , crank and cil head done .

All the above around $500 , if you want prices p.m. and i'll find out for you .

By the sound of it the oil leak is the least of your problem .

Its normal to get some condensation in the oil catch can, but if it fills up with normal street driving your engine is not healthy . Empty it out and see how long it takes to fill up , how much does it hold ? how much water in it ? How much oil does the engine use ? is it fairly stock ? how much boost ? Stock pistons or forged ?

YEh you could say it fills upwith normal street driving. I emptied it like 3 days ago, so ill see how fast it will fill up...Its a Greddy look alike...the square rectangal one. there was abit of watr in it. I got a oil cooler and relocation kit for it...soo almost 5L of oil. Its not stock, Internal wise it is....its running a gt30 with external gate., Boost im running stock. Anymore info that may be helpful for a solution?

YEh you could say it fills upwith normal street driving. I emptied it like 3 days ago, so ill see how fast it will fill up...Its a Greddy look alike...the square rectangal one. there was abit of watr in it. I got a oil cooler and relocation kit for it...soo almost 5L of oil. Its not stock, Internal wise it is....its running a gt30 with external gate., Boost im running stock. Anymore info that may be helpful for a solution?

How much oil does the catch can hold ? not the engine . I'm trying to determine how much oil goes in the catch can and how long it takes to fill up ( as in how many k's ) . How much oil does your engine use ? as in how long before you have to top it up ?if it uses say 1 lt or more per 1000 k's , the only solution i can think of is a rebuild !! If your engine is anywhere near healthy and you run stock boost you should never have to empty the catch can . You will get very little oil in there if engine is still good .

If you want to know for sure a leak-down and compression test will show the condition of your engine ...

Yeh i said it was a GREDDY LOOK ALIKE CATCH CAN....soo it doesnt hold as much....say 600ml

i have done the compression test and all cyclinders were ranging from 150 to 160.

Is there any diff from a leak down test?...i was told it was the same...

Not the same at all , you can have good compression and worn piston rings too. 150-160 a bit on the low side , when did you do the comp test ? after you realised the catch can filling up or before ?

i did the comp test after i noticed it was filling. I was more concerned when my car blew white smoke for a while...but i think that was due to the catch can being overfilled..

So can a leak down test find out that a comp cant?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...