Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Cos every sane person is either

at the pub

at the club

in bed

with friends

in bed with friends

hell, even in bed with there wife

any where but on this goddamn forum talking to desperates like you:D :lol: :lol:

Cheers

Ken

* Hmmm what does that make me *

OOPS , I double posted.

No , theres a knocking at the door....

AAARGGHHH it's Joe the whore police... nooooo , I didn't mean to do it... I'm sorry ... please don't beat me, please don't:(

Hehehehe:lol:

Cheers

Ken

Other road users do think your asleep at the wheel:lol:

I'd be really scared if Joe knocked on the door, you'd want to make sure you have plenty of public liability insurance, he'd probably trip on the door step and break his leg:lol:

See'ya:burnout:

Nah , I'm lying, he wouldn't have got up the paved driveway without going bum up:shake: :rolleyes::D

Whaat, you seen me drive then. Damn i gotta get those windows tinted darker on the van.

Scares people when they look over to see your head resting on the wheel going down the freeway :lol:

Cheers

Ken

Reflective tint, they can't see you sleeping and you don't get disturbed by the light, a win-win situation:lol:

I'm sursprised Joe's lived this long, he's accident prone. Maybe we could all chip in some money and buy him a plastic bubble to live in:lol:

See'ya:burnout:

Yep , I gotta couple of Glad bags i could put together. Will give him priolly a coupla days of air unless he falls out of it, punctures it, rolls it down a hill , sets fire to it or any innumerable other things we prolly haven't even thought of.:lol:

Cheers

Ken

Knowing Joes luck some piece of the Challenger space shuttle will burst through the atmosphere and destroy the bubble. It might be kinder just to kill him now, rather than let him suffer with accidents the rest of his life:lol:

See'ya:burnout:

Joe's taking all this in his stride, when he doesn't fall over an hurt himself:lol:

Imagine falling out of a parked car, I would just die from embarassment. Joe's dad was cool, helping to fix Hick's intercooler, we have yet to send Hicks the bill, he won't be happy when he finds out that I charge $160/hr for my time.

See'ya:burnout:

hey

leave nandos out of it lol

that is just a lil on the side stuff

i am really a hardcore jap tuner from Garage Sushi

one time on Mechanic camp we put together a engine backwards and drove it , it was so cool yeah

and then there was this one time i even drove with no exhaust

whoa

i am really tired lol

can ya tell?

adrian

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...