Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

It's amazing how polite Bully is when theres women around.

You should see how he speaks to pwptf , adrian and me late at night on here.

It's definitely not for sensitive ears Lauren aka Nizmo aka lolli

aka lolliracing .com ( what's that all about ?? )

cheers

( still up )

Ken

Originally posted by bully

Im alway polite -- until pissed off then watch out i cant control him he escapes his bounds and takes over then -&*^*)*_(*_(

aarghhh

It's gone from mild mannered Bully to

Mad man Bull*hit , post whore extraordinaire .

This is one man not to be f***ked with and will prove to be a master keyboard warrior.

Fear the mouth from the south , Madman Bull*hit......

Hehehehe

I don't know , it's all right for some people, they get paid to whore thes pages ( Skyzerr , pwptf , Bully ).

I do it for the pure fun and in my own time.

That should make me a better quality whore than you guys cos I'm dedicated ( ohh , and I have no life... )

Cheers

( coming dear.. )

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...