Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Originally posted by Nizmo

shitt thats right will n grace is on - i withdraw my previous remark -  damn i was going to watch that.

well I never !!

You would rather watch some crap American in your face , unsubtle , done to death humour than stay on here and have an intellectual discussion about your voyeuristic sex life:D

Hmmm..... on second thoughts , don't answer that.

Cheers

old wine

Ken

voyeuristic sex life? - im a doer not a watcher ken haha.

If u've read previous posts i think you've got enough bad images to last u the rest of ya lifetime - I'll let u have a rest tonight haha Its all Pauls fault he's a bad influence on me (gotta blame the person thats not here to defend themself) :D

I'm a doer and a watcher .lol

What it meant is your sex life and discussions have been up for public scrutiny on these forums for the last...........oh .......200pages.

And stop trying to boost your post count while pwpt60secf is not here to retaliate.:D

Cheers

ken

Originally posted by Sneeza

anyway guys - gotta go .

OHHH SH*TTTTT I left the sprinklers on for like an hour ARRGGHHHHH my dam is going to be DRY!  

bye guys!

Dam ???

as in Mundaring dam ??

damn they must be big sprinklers.

Cheers

Ken

my sex life hasnt been up for discussion - i see no recollection on spillin the beans about anything to do with.

Just a few suggestive playful comments being tossed aroung :D

You expect us to work during 9 -5 geez!

Originally posted by Nizmo

my sex life hasnt been up for discussion - i see no recollection on spillin the beans about anything to do with.  

Just a few suggestive playful comments being tossed aroung :D

You expect us to work during 9 -5 geez!

In pwpt60secf case ,that isn't the only thing being tossed.:D

Page ownage to the the Niz , the biatch. Damn , missed again:D

Cheers

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...