Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quick calculations would suggest that the piping configuration has an extra 45° bend over your standard 'up and across the radiator fan' config. I am only counting the bends on the outlet piping here, and assuming most people use the factory route for the inlet (to the cooler) piping.

Cooler to TB piping only:

The config in that pic has 1 x 180°, 4 x 90° and 1 x 45° bends = Total of 585°

Routing between engine and radiator fan has 6 x 90° bends = Total of 540°

Routing back to the factory locations has 1 x 180°, 2 x 90° and 4 x 45° bends = Total of 540° (well mine does anyway)

So the piping in that pic does have more bends than most layouts but whether or not the lenght of piping used is more or less is difficult to guess. I suspect when you add it all up there isn't much difference (length wise) between the 3 setups.

I have no idea what the laws of physics say about pushing air around a 180° bend as opposed to a 90° one but surely the sum of all the bends must have some bearing on velocity of the air and lag/throttle response etc.

Every bend causes a slight pressure drop, additional length/volume detrimentally affects throttle response (NOT the same as lag), so yes that would be worse off. But by how much? Well not a lot, i think it looks quite neat and it gets extra point for being different.

Gives you more torque if you can queue up the air in a nice straight line.

Why?

IMO the only real benefit of not having a bend in before the TB is to prevent any unusual flow patterns from messing with the distribution of air to each cylinder, and I tend to think this would be a small, if not negligible effect in the majority of situations. If you wanted to be pedantic, the safest bet would be to stick with the factory piping, as that's the only configuration thats had any real R&D.

I also don't understand your comments about air "backing up" at the throttle plate.

Don’t worry dude just stating an opinion, I don’t really care to discuss this boring topic in great detail. The standard setup is better I believe and it has a nice straight run off the throttle. If you like the windy piping in the Kermit car then cool, the difference it makes is insignificant anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
×
×
  • Create New...