Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Do you have a fuel pressure reg?

How do stock injectors induce the 'lag'? Would be good to know what duty cycle your hitting - you don't have a h/c?

252rwkw sounds pretty close to what i made on stock turbos. Do you have adjustable cam gears?

No i dont have a regulator or hand controller unfortunately.. the inducing lag bit didn't come out quite right. My tuner said basically if there could be more fuel put in down low it'd spool it up quicker, but the stock injectors are pretty close to their limit and pushing them closer would be living dangerously. So, if I did the fuelling upgrades im sure we could get it spooling quicker, how much quicker I got no idea.

Yeh got HKS cam gears..don't think they were adjusted with latest tune for new turbo's.

I can't see how you can be at 100% duty cycle down low? that doesn't seem right. i can see them being at 100% at 8000rpm, but not at 3000 to 4000? I could be wrong though.

I can't see how you can be at 100% duty cycle down low? that doesn't seem right. i can see them being at 100% at 8000rpm, but not at 3000 to 4000? I could be wrong though.

Exactly my thoughts. I don't know much but i would assume at 4000rpm, they only have to fire half as much as they would at 8000rpm. From what i have seen, injectors usually max out up the top of the rev range.

We need someone more knowledgable to answer :angry:

Fuel pressure reg should help get a little more out of the injectors. Only a couple of hundred bucks.

the gearbox can handle more power than that. just don't abuse the gearbox and don't put a solid centre clutch in it, i know from expereince :O

i know that gtr gear can handle more power....but jono think that his gear box is stuff...cant run....

Jerry: any idea what the difference would be between your setup and GTR032? Just tune or something else?

Well , i have a 34 engine , almost new , tune of course is different well under 12-1 at 11.5-1 , i wont run 12's on a stock engine .

I dont have cam gears or dump pipes but the 34's have s/steel dumps not cast and i have 550 injectors , the other thing mine will only make 240 awkw .

I'm not after big power in my setup , i just want a quick street car not big dyno numbers .

I did 11.8 @ 118 mph a couple of weeks ago with a bit left in her still , i'm happy the way she goes as i have plenty response , almost like a stocker and 34's are more responsive that 33's and 32's (if all 3 are stockers ) .

Actualy if i had steel wheel turbos i wouldn't bother with the gtss's , thats the reason i tried to buy an NUR M-SPEC , maybe next time !

Gtss's are not cheap but in my opinion ideal for a stock engine but stock injectors would be right on the limit , thats why i went for the Nismo 550's ( again not cheap , you can get sard much cheaper ).

Can injectors have anything to do with lag like GTR032 mentioned earlier in this thread?

Why are 34's more responsive than 33's and 32's stock?

No they shouldn't have ,as they supply all the fuel needed, i dont know if the cams are the same in the 3 cars , so that maybe one reason , different turbos is another and who knows they may run more timing as well as better dump pipes . Ports and valves i think are the same but i never had a 34 head off the car so i cant say for sure , i'm only going on what others have told me . I know from experiance they run more boost .

Are you going the gtss road Andrew ?

All you need is the turbos ,dumps, power f/c, ebc and 550 injectors , as long as you have a good donk ( do a compression and a leakdown test to confirm ) and you will have a much quicker car and almost as responsive as it is now .

GTR032: how is your car going anyway?

I had the pleasure of being a passenger in it for 1.5hrs the other night and I must say that it drives very well. It has better response/power under 3000rpm than my R33 GTS-t did with the stock turbo B)

Yep turbos and pfc are on thier way.

GTR032: how is your car going anyway?

Car's going pretty good. No dramas since new tune :P

Just got to fix up an ongoing tailshaft type vibration. After that will take it down to WSID to get a time.

It has better response/power under 3000rpm than my R33 GTS-t did with the stock turbo B)

...Deadset? Thats pretty damn cool. I sure as hell dont want to go for a ride in Fernis car when its finished...aint enough Prozac getting around

there there Troy... Just put on that GTR bonnet etc, and get three gauges for the centre console and sit in the driveway making car noises. then you will feel like a GTR owner. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...