Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Your topic for the ad was VG30, that can easily be misinterpreted to beleive it was VG30DET or VG30DETT.

All I knew is that I wanted the VG30 turbine housing which was larger than my RB25 for a hi-flow and I told you that but you didn't have a problem taking my money and then basically tough luck you can't have it back now.

I didn't know what to look for when buying it other than the larger turbine housing and with the dump pipe and heat shield on I couldn't see that.

Now it's just gotten to the point that you knew what my plans were for it and that it would be useless but you still took my money and refuse to give it back.

Is that how someone should trade on these forums?

If GCG (with their experience in turbochargers) are wrong about this one (as one person thinks) and it is in fact a VG30 then I will personally give the turbo back to the seller (he can keep my money as the turbo is useless to me) and he will have a true honest apology!

Im still waiting B)

Im sorry to say but your clueless as f***.. You've seen for yourself the handful of people on here who "think" they know it all.. leave modifications as such to people who know what there on about (someone like GCG :lol:)..

end rant!

Edited by nuR.spec
Im sorry to say but your clueless as f***.. You've seen for yourself the handful of people on here who "think" they know it all.. leave modifications as such to people who know what there on about (someone like GCG :lol:)..

end rant!

look mate, you've knowingly farked this guy over and yes he may have been naive in thinkin that all people around here are honest and helpful, but get over yourself.

you sold him a useless turbo, fair enough, thats between the two of you to sort out.

but getting on here and rubbing it in and giving crap to GCG is not gonna impress anyone.

random preson with 38post V's a SAU-Vic member,

gezz i dont even need to read the thread to know who is in the right and who is in the wrong.

Presa, i think u should pm blitz or prank and informed them of what has happen so they can ban this f**khead or watever they find fit

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...