Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was looking through the ls1.com.au forums the other day (from a link on here)

- They were talking about Dyno'ing, and the fact that they got different results from how tightly the car was strapped down.

Is there a specific tightness etc? - I'd guess you need to strap her down to get traction, but can you tighten too much?

IIRC, they lost power from stapping down a car too much!!!!?

(I could see if they didn't strap it down enough, but....)

I'd link to the post, but the forums on ls1 doesn't have a search function I can find... It was a post talking about test results from supercharging/turbocharging a V8 engine.

Thoughts?

To Quote from the LS1's Forums :

We have done back-to-back testing between our dyno and 3 others (CSV, Autotechnique, G & D) and found there to be excellent consistancy between all 4 dyno's +/- 5rwkw @ ~300rwkw. All done on the same day, same tune. We run ours in DIN certification, which just happens to reduce the observed numbers by about the same as the traction-slip encountered.

We participated in some testing by the author of the DynoLogic software (Andrew E) to try and establish what is "lost" through tyres and roller inertia and it was VERY interesting. As a "rule of thumb" we found that 10 to 25rwkw could be sacrificed by varying tyre pressures and vehicle retention (strapping down).

This was again verified recently at the F1 Performance dyno day when our Monaro was run ... the 1st run was 317rwkw and showing a bit of wheelspin, so I asked it to be pulled down tighter ... the next 2 runs were about 300rwkw. My fault, but it indicates the method of strapping can have a significant effect.

http://www.ls1.com.au/forum/showthread.php...89&page=2&pp=15

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/92943-dynos-why/
Share on other sites

In dyno dynamics shootout mode the ramp rate is fixed for 4,6,8cyl and 4,6,8 cyl forced induction plus a few others 2R 3R 4X4 ect ect. The reason that strapping is essential in comparing graphs is that if the car is allowed to torque up onto the front roller it is therefore not spinning the rear roller hence faster acceleration rates; hence more power and torque.

A properly designed strapping system should force the tyre into the roller more and more as the torque increases rather than just forcing the tyres down.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/92943-dynos-why/#findComment-1676914
Share on other sites

yeah, if you want to know the performance of your car, take it to the track. a dyno is just a guide pretty much, dynos werent exactly designed specifically for power runs, more the tuning etc side. i think the dyno (dynamics ?) site they go into a bit of detail.

if you think your car suck, just loosen the straps, ive heard of a gain of 17kw doing that! :D cheapest power mod ever... ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/92943-dynos-why/#findComment-1677056
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
×
×
  • Create New...