Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well i am sort of at work still I did 7 to 6:45 today and have pretty much been oncall waiting for f**king (INSERT CARRIER NAME HERE) to call me as they are repairing our icon link sdljgjksldgjklsdlg i am so going to get a call at like 1 in the morning and have to get up and test everythings working

So andrew if you barely have 5 minutes to scratch yourself... How do you have time to prepare and submit such ridiculous rants on internet forums? Surely that time could be better used sucking new clients off until you make that crucial sale?

Dont put yourself on the high ground champ, your a real estate agent not the new Ghandi! I appreciate what you do might take a lot of effort, but making a blanket statement about anyone who works 8 hour days??? Not cool.

You put it perfectly when you said its "your choice" so stop ranting about it and get on with it.

All I hear is whinge whinge whinge, I work for probably a good 4 hours a day, the rest I spend drinking coffees, sms'ing, watching TV, playing playstation or cruising around fyshwick.... Life is good and it is so because of the choice I made.

I may not have all the money in the world but it pays the bills and keeps my car as sweet as it is so Im happy (as long as I still have the weekends). :P

Slither, you work in Fyshwick dont you... Just off of Canberra Ave.

I see your car heaps.

yeah next to the car wash where are do you work???

hope you don't see me doing anything to stupid LOL

Well im at work from 5am - 730pm, and not uncommon till 12am.

It drains you, but i will now high light how i said im "AT" work between those hours......not nesesarily doing work hehehe.

My jobs cool. I spend a large portion of it, watching TV, on the internet, drinking coffee, sleeping on the couch cause i went out all night and got changed in the carpark at 5am in the morning heehh or just sleeping coz im sick of kerry anne and burt on the morning tv.

yeah next to the car wash where are do you work???

hope you don't see me doing anything to stupid LOL

I thought so, I see your car everytime I go round to rinse off my car ( I park under a tree at work)...

I havent seen you do anything stupid yet :)

I work at Ingrams on Townsville street, pretty much straight across from the post office.

If you ever need anything Auto electrical or air con, drop in and see me, ill look ater you cos your a Skyline man :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...