Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In need of a new AFM soon (upgrading cefiro loom, ecu etc with r32 components, long story.....) and curious if the Z32 AFM will work with a standard r32 rb20det ecu? i'm guessing it may run a little more rich but other then that should it idle, run just like normal? (would prefer upgrading now to the z32 while i need a AFM rather then later buying another one when i upgrade ecu)

Btw i've done a few searches but with no luck...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93874-z32-afm-on-rb20-stock-ecu/
Share on other sites

purple one is the standard cefiro AFM, and due to me soon using a r32 cpu, ignition module etc (which are different) i'd prefer to use the green label one over the purple one. If that makes sense. And don't ask why i'm changing ecu's, its a long story.

no point going z32 afm. it's more expensive than rb20det afm.. I didn't know cefiro's had different ones. anyway, stock afm from an r32 gtst or an r33 gtst should be around $100 from wreckers (green label)

z32 are same size as rb20det but have more resolution. If you actually *need* the extra resolution, ie u have enough power that u are running out of res. you would probably already have an aftermarket ecu and aftermarket injectors anyway...

I have an rb20det afm if you need one to test it. It works fine, just occasionally (like maybe every 10 times I drive the car) the idle plays up a bit. U can have it for $30 if you just need something to test with. PM me if interested in in bentleigh, vic.

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig

$100? HAH I just got quoted $330 for a stock afm from TNH pfft

Maybe thats just caus I'm a chick and they think I don't know better? I don't know but I hope noone would be stupid enough to pay $330.

Merlin you don't happen to have a working one do you?

no, this one works fine, just this intermittant problem every now and then. But for testing purposes it's fine. Though, I replace it because it was causing that problem.

Kaz, i'd recommend going to a different wreckers from now on <_<

If you find yourself in SE suburbs, try

Oakleigh Mechanical Repairs

176 Kangaroo Rd, Oakleigh

ph 9568 4877

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...