Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At this stage no!

Dart and CRD have been the two workshops behind the complete build and tune and the results speak for themselves.

At the end of the day I had the motor build to withstand significantly more power than im actually chasing, to leave me a buffer should I choose to go after more HP at a later stage.

So far for the street the GT-SS's have proved to be a great turbo choice so I really cant complain

Nick,

As you know all the hardware on my car was done by DART & tuned by CRD!

Its great to see these gtr guru's truly shine :rolleyes:

Congratulations mate - we shall catch up soon! (after my final tune)

Marko.

At this stage no!

Dart and CRD have been the two workshops behind the complete build and tune and the results speak for themselves.

At the end of the day I had the motr build to withstand significantly more power than im actually chasing, to leave me a buffer should I choose to go after more HP at a later stage.

So far for the street the GT-SS's have proved to be a great turbo choice so I really cant complain

blk180,

im keen to see the results myself - fingers crossed it is now run in after covering 4500km...

it is currently tuned at 325awkw, i have been waiting for that extra 'ooomf' for quite some time now!

363awkw on bp ultimate so should be interesting...

Marko.

Marko R1 cant wait to see what those GTRS turbos can really do sould be good

tommy k,

it is booked for next week so it will be ready friday.

do u have a similar setup? If im mistaken i thought that u were running gtss turbos

Marko

Marko

when will it be ready.

Gimme a date please :P

tommy k,

it is booked for next week so it will be ready friday.

do u have a similar setup? If im mistaken i thought that u were running gtss turbos

Marko

Marko,

Im running the garrett '2530s'. Im also waiting for a retune. Car pulled 315rwkw on a dynolog with coil pack failure. Since then, adding a new fuel pump and coils, the car feels quicker than the 315rwkw run. Adding more timing (4 degrees more) and more fuel the car feels a load MORE quicker even, without any knock issues. So im very keen to see how we go also.

But look very forward to see your results.

400awkw shouldnt be too far away.

I hear Nick just bought a T51R SPL :P LOL

tommy k has 2560s would be nice if we could get Morgs graph and yours from CRD. morgs was running a T04Z

I have that, and the difference in spoolup is quite dramatic. The difference does lie in the top end though, T04z > 2x2560

I have the sheets on my pc at home. Will endeavour to post em up. Bear in mind, Morgs made more power in a different run, so the only real relevance would be the spoolup and torque curves ?

EDIT - I have Morgs' run from Bel on the same sheet as my best run, not the CRD one. But at least this way its a more accurate comparison

:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...