Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm pretty sure HICAS works by either steering the rear wheels out of phase with the fronts to sharpen turn in response at low speeds, or in phase to reduce understeer at high speeds. They don't turn much, only a couple of degrees, but you can definitely feel the rear end moving around with the HICAS working.

Edited by Big Rizza

Big Rizza is right, it uses a combination of steering wheel angle, speed and lateral force sensors to determine the angle to set the back wheels to.

Aswell as making turning response sharper is also tries to correct oversteer, the best example of this I've seen is the gtr special top gear did. Clarkson had a big drift going and as soon as he went to correct it you could see the rear snap into place, looked cool and great for normal driving but you can see why people use lock bars :D

^^^just to clear up any misunderstandings some people might have...

That would be the Super HICAS off a gtr

HICAS found on gtst's work on the same principle, but only the rear wheels move as opposed to all four with super hicas.

Whered you get that great pic from lbfalcon??

Poombah.. HICAS found on gtst's work on the same principle, but only the rear wheels move as opposed to all four with super hicas.

Think about what you said - of course all 4 move, the front 2 are controlled by you.. the back 2 by HICAS, the main difference is the number of degrees that the rear wheels move - super hicas is up to +/-1 degree I think, vs normal hicas is only +/-0.5degrees

Links.

They can move more than 1 degree.

I think it's more like 1.5 degree normally. The R34 can do a little dance when you reset the hicas, and it moves much more than 2 degrees when it's reseting itself.

hehe the pic was one that I posted of the translation I did of the Super HICAS system which comes in R33 GTSt's. The original image came out of the R33 GTSt sales brochure.

Big Rizza is right, it uses a combination of steering wheel angle, speed and lateral force sensors to determine the angle to set the back wheels to.

Aswell as making turning response sharper is also tries to correct oversteer, the best example of this I've seen is the gtr special top gear did. Clarkson had a big drift going and as soon as he went to correct it you could see the rear snap into place, looked cool and great for normal driving but you can see why people use lock bars :D

I was under the impression that, the particular event where Clarkson had the drift going was at relatively low speed exiting a second gear corner at full throttle. I thought he was demonstrating the ATTESSA system, and he was holding the drift in second gear out of the corner until the front gripped and immediately straightened him up. I have only seen the clip once on T.V ages ago before I even had my learners, that was all I remember.

Poombah.. HICAS found on gtst's work on the same principle, but only the rear wheels move as opposed to all four with super hicas.

Think about what you said - of course all 4 move, the front 2 are controlled by you.. the back 2 by HICAS, the main difference is the number of degrees that the rear wheels move - super hicas is up to +/-1 degree I think, vs normal hicas is only +/-0.5degrees

My bad. Should've elaborated more...

I know what you said but what I meant with 'same principle' is that they both steer wheels to adjust the car :(

hehe the pic was one that I posted of the translation I did of the Super HICAS system which comes in R33 GTSt's. The original image came out of the R33 GTSt sales brochure.

So you're saying T's came with S-hicas also? If so, then I should've looked a little harder when buying my car :(

If you think of a Skyline as what its supposed to be... ie a sporty passenger car, then HICAS is awesome. If you take a corner too fast it kicks in and helps you keep the car in control and back on line.

If you're a fully sick drifter or die hard trackday warrior, then HICAS is like going on a date with a hot chick and having your mom run upto your car to give you a scarf so you don't catch a cold... ie... nice thought, but totally useless. You want to control your car one way, and HICAS wants to help so it makes your car go the other way.

ATTESA stands for "Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All Electronic Torque Split" = torque distribution

HICAS stands for "High Capacity Active Steering" = steering

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...