Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gibson also rebuilt their engines every race meeting, oh and it was a race car running race fuel, we are talking street cars here that have limited fuel choices.

I got no idea what compression ratio is ideal, but the Group A cars were meant to be running on control Shell fuels. I seem to recall the fuel was not too exotic, actually i dont recall there being any mention of a fuel change when they changed from Grp As to V8s and these days they do run Shell Optimax. What the equivelant back in 90-93 was im not sure, but it wasnt too exotic

why do you want to run such a high C/R anyway? sacrificing reliabilty, my motor is 30/25 i have a C/R of 7:1 as it allows me to run higher boost and then bring my to4e66 turbo into range(round 25psi) allowing it to make good power. 480bhp with standard manifold, standard cams and stock camgears!

The bathurst sierra cosworths ran 5:1 C/R allowing it to run up to 45psi boost to bring the turbos into range!

:(

7.1 holy god, that would be a pig of a car off boost.

I aint heard of that since the VL boys out West and thier "fully sick decomp plate" for 11ty billion psi

You dont need it to be that low at all for 25psi

Stick with the 9:1 it will work well, especially with a set of lumpy sticks.

Problem is there are no on the shelf pistons that get anywhere near that.. 8.6:1 I think is the closest you will get.

Unless CP's run some wierd pinheight, dome config.

it may not need to be that low but as it is my daily driving car on pump fuel with no additives it suits my purpose and i still have full boost by 3000rpm! and i have a mate of mine with a vl that had 9.5:1 c/r making 400bhp on 22psi and he melted 2 pistons as apposed to any mate of mine that has the exact same setup except he was running 7.8:1 c/r making 412bhp on 26psi and hasn't had a drama so imo i'd rather be on the safer side rather than pushing it to the brink! But that's just me :)

One solution is JE forged VG30DETT pistons at 87.5mm . The gudgeon pins are larger so rods need work .

If boost pressure is a measure of resistance to airflow then high boost is a lame excuse to get more air in . If you reduce the resistance to flow then same volume at lower pressure will make everything else easier . High boost pressure needs high fuel rail pressure/expensive pumps/expensive fuels/etc .

The RS500 YBD engine had a dog of a turbo making an unreliable pig of an engine for road or Grp A . You need to look at better examples than this .

Cheers A .

  • 2 weeks later...

I was talking to Mick from Rocket Industries and he emailed me this:

The RB25 head has a a larger combustion chamber than the the RB26.

The dome on the AP332104 is .110" high. The dome on the AP332105 is .155 high. This will give more comp.

I spoke with our RB expert here and he reckons that the AP332105 might be a better option.

I believe the AP332104 are ARIAS pistons that give 8.5:1 CR and AP332105 are pistons that are used for RB26/30 convertion. I was advised to use the AP332105 pistons for RB25/30 convertion. Two questions though:

1. What kind of CR would this give

2. Would the higher piston sit proud of the block requiring thicker metal head gasket

Still... I wouldn't be going by what some one says..

Its much safer to simply measure it all up, you then know what + or - dome required. My Rb25 head cc'd up at 62.2cc's.

The Rb25 and 26 pistons also vary in their Pin height. So this is something also to look at if you want to optimize squish, which why wouldn't you for a little bit of research. :(

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
×
×
  • Create New...