Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The subwoofer I have has a built in amp.

If I buy an amp to power my speakers, how do I wire that up?

Can I just split the power and the REM and connect one to the sub and one to the amp, or do I need to run two power cables, and two REM cables?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94561-installing-2-amplifiers/
Share on other sites

really depends on how much power you want to run and what sort of power cable you have running, what are you looking at getting put in and what size is the amp you are looking at and the sub you have?

the sub is a little 8" in a tube

like some kinda bazooka sub

its not very powerful

the amp im looking at getting will probably be 400-500 watts

so the REM cable doesn't matter much? it's more the gauge of the power cable?

what happens with the fuse as well?

yeah, the REM cable is just the remote wire from the head unit telling the amps to turn on when the head unit is on, the power wire is the one you need to make sure will run enough power through it...

what size fuse is it and what is the gauge of the power wire?

if the wiring was some sort of amp wiring kit package thing or similar then the fuse etc should be okay to run it, something like 8gauge or higher...mine runs 4 gauge with a 60amp fuse at the front...

Yeah, I might just buy a new wiring kit for a high powered amp I guess.

I'm not sure what gauge the wires are, it's red, that's all I know :)

I might just get JB to install it when they do the alarm I guess

the easiest way to wire up the two amps is to run one wire which is at least 6 but better to be 8 gauge from the battery + to your preferable 60 amp fuse and then continue that thicker wire into the cabin and wire it into a power splitting box, you can get stackes of em from jb or whatever they just a metal conductive box with plasic around it and u screw the wires in, you can put the one feed from the +12 into it and then 2 wires out, these wires dont have to be as thick as the original wire but i would suggest at least 6 gauge, wire these two +12 wires into your different amps, then run sepparate ground wires going to different spots for both the amps, and with the REM (remote) wire run it from the headunit into the first amp and then connect it up to the 2nd amp, it doesnt matter isf it runs in parrallel or series it only used to tell the amps to turn on, with four rca's if u have frt rear and sub out, run the frt n rear out's to the amp with the speekers and the sub out to the sub ect if not use splitters, hopefully this helps you AND SAVES SOME MONEY

i run two amps, i have one cable for each amp coming from the battery, different size and an appropriate fuse for each amp.

for the earths i have used the same size as the power cable back to the battery.

i dont like the splitter boxes because if you have a system that draws a fair amount of current, its good to have good joins between cables, such as clamping them down in the battery terminals (proper ones not the original jap ones!) whereas the splitter boxes only have a small contact area and dont clamp down very well.

if you have a smaller system(sounds like u have) it wont matter so splitter box will make things a bit easier :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...