Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Squizz, did this idiot have an accent by any chance??? If he did and you can identify said accent, I may know where this asshole works!!

I can do much better than the police!!!!!!

Dave

Couldn't catch an accent through the helmet etc but he was a damn sight larger than I am and would be in his 40's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1731351
Share on other sites

It's a motorbike dude.

well i didnt know that motorbikes had 3 numbers on there plates, never really looked at one up close, hate the bloddy things with a passion. too many ppl i know have been either killed or injured severly on them. stupic things they are. /end rant <_<

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1733396
Share on other sites

For all those people who are getting agro about the bike riders that go up the middle... here's some food for thought...

On a bike you have nothing to protect you, you have people who merge on top of you without seeing you and you have people who just don't care as they're driving something up to 10 times the size of you and your bike. Its an unwritten rule, you either sit behind the traffic or you get in front, otherwise you get killed!!!!

Fair enough this guy is seriously in the wrong and i hope you get your car fixed etc at his expense, but that doesn't mean that because a bike rider goes up the middle of traffic that he's a loose cannon or complete asshole. Yes they are skipping the traffic cue, but also looking after themselves as there's nothing to protect them once you hit them!! This is just aimed at the people who were getting agro at those riders who go up the middle of traffic

Edited by Mase
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1736194
Share on other sites

For all those people who are getting agro about the bike riders that go up the middle... here's some food for thought...

On a bike you have nothing to protect you, you have people who merge on top of you without seeing you and you have people who just don't care as they're driving something up to 10 times the size of you and your bike. Its an unwritten rule, you either sit behind the traffic or you get in front, otherwise you get killed!!!!

Fair enough this guy is seriously in the wrong and i hope you get your car fixed etc at his expense, but that doesn't mean that because a bike rider goes up the middle of traffic that he's a loose cannon or complete asshole. Yes they are skipping the traffic cue, but also looking after themselves as there's nothing to protect them once you hit them!! This is just aimed at the people who were getting agro at those riders who go up the middle of traffic

Its his choice to ride a bike, with that comes its risks as with anything, something you have to keep in mind when riding a bike. Sure enough there it is alot more dangerous riding a bike on the roads, but thats the gamble you take if you want to ride sadly. If i can get fined and lose points for driving normaly on the roads than this guy should be fined and made to pay back what damage he has done. Its his choice to break the law by going up the middle of cars during stoped traffic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1739584
Share on other sites

For all those people who are getting agro about the bike riders that go up the middle... here's some food for thought...

On a bike you have nothing to protect you, you have people who merge on top of you without seeing you and you have people who just don't care as they're driving something up to 10 times the size of you and your bike. Its an unwritten rule, you either sit behind the traffic or you get in front, otherwise you get killed!!!!

Fair enough this guy is seriously in the wrong and i hope you get your car fixed etc at his expense, but that doesn't mean that because a bike rider goes up the middle of traffic that he's a loose cannon or complete asshole. Yes they are skipping the traffic cue, but also looking after themselves as there's nothing to protect them once you hit them!! This is just aimed at the people who were getting agro at those riders who go up the middle of traffic

That's fair but I have no regards for the safty of a biker who rides up the middle of traffic WHILE ITS MOVING!!!!!!! Hey if they want to do that expect me to give them hell as I always do......

Nothing any one can say will ever change my view on that, coming from a bike rider in the past too.......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1739841
Share on other sites

Please don't group all bikers in with the mentality of the moron listed at the top of the thread. Regardless of whether you're on a bike, in a car, you're a pedestrian, or whatever, if you damage someone else's property you should take responsibility for it. I suspect that this "person" would be an arrogrant prick regardless of what mode of transport he was using at the time.

I don't understand the problem that people have with bike riders cutting through STOPPED traffic, except in situations where (like in Squizz's case) they don't leave enough space. If you have to worry about handlebars taking your mirrors off, it's too close. If they are obviously taking considerable care, then I don't have a problem with it.

Don't forget that nearly all bike riders drive cars too and are exposed to exactly the same things from bike riders when in their cars. In my experience, car drivers are a lot worse to bikers than vice versa. On my bike I've had people merge onto me while looking me in the eyes (so they knew I was there), obviously thinking "he'll move or get run over".

And before I start, for what it's worth I don't split moving traffic, or traffic stopped at lights. I *only* split lanes during a traffic jam, and then it's at a pace where I can literally stop on the spot (usually <20km/h). That said I don't care if people want to split lanes, as long as they're sensible about it. I've seen idiots split lanes on the back wheel. Feel free to open your door/swing your hiab out on them.

Any bike that lane splits when I'm up front gets a rude shock when the lights go green. Report the plate....take the f**ker down.....then laugh at him when you see him again.

And no amount of cake can shut my hole on that topic.

I agree *if* the biker is causing a problem by splitting. If he is going up the middle and leaving plenty of space, and makes a decent effort not to hold up traffic when the lights go green, then I don't care if one goes past my window. Note that deciding to hold the throttle flat just to make it hard for the bike to pull back into traffic does not mean that the bike was the one causing the problem. That's like blaming the toaster for electrocuting you, when you were the one jamming the knife in it.
HMM... im always tempted to open my door everytime i see them coming up behind me in traffic and say -- ooppss.

I had some moron in a car do that to me one time when I was idling through completely stopped traffic (as in, people were locking their cars and walking across the road to the shops). I was doing all of about 15km/h, and this guy got all agro and kicked his door open in front of me and screamed "why can't you <bleeeep> just wait like everyone else has to?". I calmy asked him that if there was a perfectly safe way for him to get through the traffic jam, would he take it... he said "that's not the <bleep> point" etc. It's just a case of people getting the shits that you can get through when they can't. I gave up trying to reason with him when he began threatening violence... I ended up having to tell him to either try hitting me (me in full suit of armour and kevlar knuckles = teh win), or to shut his door and let me get the f*ck on with my day.
That's fair but I have no regards for the safty of a biker who rides up the middle of traffic WHILE ITS MOVING!!!!!!! Hey if they want to do that expect me to give them hell as I  always do...... 

Nothing any one can say will ever change my view on that, coming from a bike rider in the past too.......

Exactly. Splitting moving traffic is stupid.

Off-topic: longest post EVAR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1748707
Share on other sites

If there isn't room, then don't do it. I cannot stand it when wankers on Harley's try it and end up having to lean the bike way over to avoid a mirror and they almost always look like they couldn't lift it if it fell!!

I repeat.... If there isn't room, then don't split the traffic.

Having said that, if they get to the front and cannot beat me, then pick a lane at least and be gracious in defeat, don't get nasty and try to kick my pride and joy. I will follow you to the ends of the earth and snap you in two!! Rant over....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1749301
Share on other sites

Yeah report the tard...splitting lanes has always been illegal, no it's not a safety for bikes thats why they do it kinda thing.

It's a dangerous thing to do and the impatient prick deserves what he should get, a fine and a repair bill.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1749652
Share on other sites

Yeah report the tard...splitting lanes has always been illegal, no it's not a safety for bikes thats why they do it kinda thing.

It's a dangerous thing to do and the impatient prick deserves what he should get, a fine and a repair bill.

It's only illegal if the traffic is moving. You cannot overtake a moving vehicle in the same lane. BUT you can pass a stationary vehicle in the same lane.

It is a case of being pedantic with laws that don't really apply to the exact situation. There is no actual law that deals with "splitting" lanes on a bike.

BUT this incident has naff all to do with that.

His vehicle collided with your stationary vehicle that was in a valid and legal position on the road. He is at fault and liable for damage that he has caused to your vehicle.

Book him Danno

(heh, just realised, probably no-one under at least 30 will get the Hawii Five-O referance)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1750355
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...