Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whores

Gezzz you guys are whores... God dam....

I think you Postwhores need to be Auto restricted to certain amount of posts a day so you can't kill everyones bloody thread.

Need a New Thread Option:

Enable / Disable posts from Postwhores.

I think some sort of Postwhore enforcement needs to come in. Like when you create a thread you can tick the option, 'Protect from PostWhores' & if a post whore posts more than x amount in x time, then they're disabled from thread for 7 days or wateva.

Edited by geno8r
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94993-enable-disable-posts-from-postwhores/
Share on other sites

no its just these 2 or 3 or 4 people who decided they would whore the f**k out of every thread since the postwhore label was shown need to realise they are annoying the shit out of everyone..

the admins may want to look at un-indexing the wasteland threads

as they just get hammered with updates about pointless crap

either that or reset them back to 0 posts, the vic one is like 60,000 pages of junk. waste of index resources i reckon

Settle down all you bitches. I couldn't give a rats arse if people postwhore, as long as its contained within the wasteland section and the state specific chat threads.

If anyone is seen postwhoring outside of those nominated areas, the mods can and will place you under mod review (ie all your posts thereafter will have to be authorised by a mod before it shows on a thread).

Now the mods can't be keeping tabs on all the sections and all the threads, so the onus is on you guys to let us know. If you see anyone postwhoring or trolling outside of those nominated areas, feel free to report the post so a mod can deal with it.

No, this is bull shit Shan

What will it take for some action against these tards ?

With the amount of possible reports that will be sent the reporters will be warned for spamming moderators with reports before anything is acheived.

Once the POSTWHORE tags appeared all the kids came out of the cracks.

When does school go back?

Edited by Slide

As I said, IF you find someone postwhoring or trolling outside the nominated area, report it. I leave it to your good judgement what postwhoring is, ie more than one completely irrelevant post by the same user with no point in mind other than to bump one's postcount up. When reporting a user's posts in a thread, be considerate and don't report every single post in the thread by the user, and where possible combine reports from multiple threads about a single user into one report.

Leave the moderating part up to the moderators. If you're being irrational or over enthusiastic in reporting people, or if you're seen only to be reporting certain other members out of spite, then I'm sure they'll let you know in due time. I'm sure the 4 people who slim speaks of will watch where they post in the future, or risk being placed on moderator review.

What's done is done. I suggest you don't dig up the annals of SAU history to trace all the posts that can be reported. Just report the ones that happen in the future.

That said, we are working on a new version of the forum atm. I'll see to it that the new implementation dosen't use post counts to avoid people having a running tally of how they're doing against each other. I've removed the postcount that shows uner the username next to each post as a slight deterrant for now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...