Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was wondering which one is best. I found out that stock mount ARC cooler will give more power than a front mount 600...300...76 HYBRID cooler..Is it true?

How come such a small cooler provide more power than a front mount.?.

Edited by rajja
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95512-front-mount-and-stock-mount-cooler/
Share on other sites

the arc cooler is much better consuction and argued as one the best on the market than the hybrid and has better flow charactoristics and as it mounts in the stock location and same lengh pipeing as opposed to the front mount which will have more piping , the main difference is that you will have slightly better throttle response with one in the same location, as there is less volume the air needs to fill before the intake.

i run a d1 drift fmic kit and i think it is quite good, and i didnt really notice and lag or less respone thought i am not running stock boost and i was running 11 psi in stock cooler and once a changed it seemed a lot less restrictive, not sure what i would be like with stock boost though.

the end of the day i feel that the fmic will cool better as opposed to a cooler on an angle and it is harder for it to pass though.

it alll depends what sor of boost and power you would like to obtain.

hope i have been helpful

the arc cooler is much better consuction and argued as one the best on the market than the hybrid and has better flow charactoristics and as it mounts in the stock location and same lengh pipeing as opposed to the front mount which will have more piping , the main difference is that you will have slightly better throttle response with one in the same location, as there is less volume the air needs to fill before the intake.

i read a write up on a silvia running a rb26dett probably seen it but it was running at 26psi through one of those puppies :P

i wasn't going to upgrade my cooler to a front mount coz i got a autospoiler (r31) and the size i would fit in there wouldnt be worth it but i think ill throw one of those arc smic ones on

Edited by Space Goat

26psi through a standard side mount cooler? great idea.

i think the stock cooler isn't too bad i just think the location doesn't make it as efficient as the other stock based intercoolers. i think you had an r34 or arc smic core on the front it would be quite nice and wouldnt have as much volume as a 600x300 core

26psi through a standard side mount cooler? great idea.

i think the stock cooler isn't too bad i just think the location doesn't make it as efficient as the other stock based intercoolers. i think you had an r34 or arc smic core on the front it would be quite nice and wouldnt have as much volume as a 600x300 core

i think he meant the ARC one. i was looking at getting one for my 180 but was a bit out of budget... but according to the seller they can handle 27psi.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...