Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeh he run a 7.92@256

and backed off from what ive heard he didnt even get into top gear

another lil whisper ive heard is that hes developing a 2.8 to slot into it

so should be interesting :D

heres the clip if youre interested

http://media.putfile.com/Reece-McGregor-R3...-256kmh-14-mile

I doubt that he didn't get into top gear. I hate it when a car does a great time and then people say, "it wasn't on full boost", "the clutch was slipping" or it missed a gear".

excuse if i seem rude but please quiet in the cheap seats and shut up.

i was there and i saw the run in person so believe me when i say he didnt get into top gear and he did back off.

and was far from a perfect run.

to be perfectly honest i was dumfounded when i saw 7.92 on the board as i thought it didnt look as fast as sum of his previous 8 second runs.

The man himself said he didn't get into top gear - they don't have a reputation of talking shit (maybe this is common in Oz???).... 256kph trap speed when they usually run 270+ is an obvious sign. Apparently they are working on what went wrong with the box with the intent of running tomorrow. I guess that will clear some stuff up??

They've already done an 8.033 @ 172mph already - so no matter what way you look at it, a solid seven second pass is inevitable... if not now, with the new motor.

The man himself said he didn't get into top gear - they don't have a reputation of talking shit (maybe this is common in Oz???).... 256kph trap speed when they usually run 270+ is an obvious sign.  Apparently they are working on what went wrong with the box with the intent of running tomorrow.  I guess that will clear some stuff up??

They've already done an 8.033 @ 172mph already - so no matter what way you look at it, a solid seven second pass is inevitable... if not now, with the new motor.

The car has already run a 7.9@162MPH (backing off).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...