Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The gearbox should be good for about 500hp, after that your living on borrowed time. There are some replacement gear sets, or you could nitride your gears to give them extra strength. Anything more than 500hp will severly push the limits of the drivetrain.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9736-which-rods/page/3/#findComment-165600
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You will definately need a decent clutch, the driveline should be fine as long as you are not into hard launches, which I assume you are not into if you are chasing bottom end and a nice wide torque curve.

The only reason I say the rb25de head instead of the rb25det is that the det has vvt on the inlet, and if you want torque, your best off getting cam gears, therefore de head rather than det.

Something else to think about - if you get head and block, you can get the work done - which will take weeks- while your car is on the road. To fit the 3040, you will need a custom manifold and wastegate and a new dump pipe - so the stock one wont be of much use to you. Ultimately, being stuck with a whole heap of parts isnt much use to you - IMHO it would be alot easier to sell the old motor as compete as possible, you could even take a prospective buyer for a test drive and let a mechanic check it out, then when the other engine is ready, swap them over.

I am absolutely not saying that you need to use the rb25de head instead of the rb25det, just some food for thought

steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9736-which-rods/page/3/#findComment-165702
Share on other sites

The rb25de head has slightly more aggressive cams, and although they would be replaced in the end they might be a bit better in the short term.

500rwhp, but hard lauches with slicks will kill it sooner than that. A minimum of a twin-plate clutch will be needed.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9736-which-rods/page/3/#findComment-165708
Share on other sites

hahaha... thank Merli. I've got an OS Twin in there now and it's sweet. Don't know if i should delve into the RB30 block. At the end of the day i'll be up for some $$$ doing the clutch and gearbox all the time. I might do the Skyline up nicely and get a buzz box like an RX3 or R100 13B Turbo.

With the oil galleries on the RB25DET head, are they the ones for Variable Cam Timing? Is that worth keeping for the trouble of doing all the welding and drilling etc?

Thanks Steve, i'm on there now having a look!

Andrew

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9736-which-rods/page/3/#findComment-166028
Share on other sites

Merli,

I have the same feeling about the triples, great if your never going to drive the car on the street, but useless if you are. My OS twin is sprung and is very easy to drive, but twins will still take a pounding, but I think I'd rather repair it than drive with a triple.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9736-which-rods/page/3/#findComment-166075
Share on other sites

Merli, your not the first guy I have heard making similar comments about triple plate v's twin. Hoping I never have to go down that path.

GTS-t VSPEC, I think that one of the gtrs SST have built with approx 540hp (at the wheels?) uses a hks twin plate, but that is a circuit car - spose it depends on how hard you drop the thing off the mark, have you tried to 'drive' off the line like they do with huge hp gtrs? I'm working on that myself, and if you get it right you can get off the line very quickly - even a bit easier to control wheel spin. Might save you a box rebuild too, once the hp starts rising further? I am currently running a 9 button ceramic ferride with 2500lb pressure plate and at 203rwkw havent had the slightest sign of slippage (probably a bit early) - hope it holds on a little longer......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9736-which-rods/page/3/#findComment-166128
Share on other sites

Steve,

For the drags I have been slipping the clutch rather than dropping it, it is the slipping which kills them. I know the car you are talking about, and agree that a twin is ample in most cases, even if it need the occasional rebuild.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9736-which-rods/page/3/#findComment-166553
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...