Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Im having some real trouble with my car at the moment, its a 1993 RB25DET. Have recent rebuilt the motor with forgies, new rods, new plenum, bigger zuast and new cams etc etc... but its making less power than before, 268rwkw droped to around 230rwkw it should be making over 300 :)

My tuner has pretty much put it down to that the cams havent been dailed in right, I wont say who put em in :(:D but what I need is the dail in sheets you get with the cams as I seem to have misplaced them.

I contacted the recommeded HKS dealer in Aus but werent very helpful and pretty much said seeing you didnt buy em through us "stiff shit" so...

The cams are HKS items 256deg\inlet 8.8 lift and 264deg\exhaust 9.0 lift.

So if ANYBODY has them or can help me could you contact me or send them through to me, all my details are below

Mob No: 0407944561

Fax: 03 63310277

Email: [email protected]

or just PM me

If anyone can help me please do as im really stuck at the moment.

Cheers,

Luke

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98348-cam-problems-urgent-help-needed/
Share on other sites

have you got a picture of them with the cam gear covers off?

do they hgave ADJ cam gears with them or just using the standard ones?

have you set the bottom end to top dead centre and checked the markings on the backing plate of the cam gear covers?

have you got a picture of them with the cam gear covers off?

do they hgave ADJ cam gears with them or just using the standard ones?

have you set the bottom end to top dead centre and checked the markings on the backing plate of the cam gear covers?

Ive got an adj exh gear which is set to 0 and yep it was setup with it at TDC and all markings on backplate, gears and belt all lined up perfect but turner seem to think that with aftermarket cams they still need to be dialed in as they can be out even with this all perfect.

Ive got an adj exh gear which is set to 0 and yep it was setup with it at TDC and all markings on backplate, gears and belt all lined up perfect but turner seem to think that with aftermarket cams they still need to be dialed in as they can be out even with this all perfect.

Nope they don't, HKS cams are dialed in perfectly at the the standard markings. It doesn't matter anyway, you are going to tune the camshaft timing on the dyno using the adjustable camshaft pulleys. So setting them up perfectly first is a complete waste of time. The most common setting is 4 degrees retarde on the exhaust and 2 degrees advanced on the inlet. But every car is different.

:P cheers :D

hi sk

what advantages does this give as a rule of thumb

as each different set of cams would require different config to get the most yes?

and by most - who wants top end who wants down low?

so what would 4 degrees retarde on the exhaust and 2 degrees advanced do?

i presume more midrange?

Sydneykid is right Luke, Your going to adjust your Exh cam using your Adjustable Cam Gear. I have the HKS Instruction sheets at home here but from memory there is only a Dial In Sheet with the HKS Exhaust Cam. If you really need the Instructions I can Scan and Email to you if you want.

Ken

Sydneykid is right Luke, Your going to adjust your Exh cam using your Adjustable Cam Gear. I have the HKS Instruction sheets at home here but from memory there is only a Dial In Sheet with the HKS Exhaust Cam. If you really need the Instructions I can Scan and Email to you if you want.

Ken

If you could Ken that would be great, it would make my tuner happy anyway, my email address is the earlier post ;)

What he wants to know is;

What lift it should have at TDC

Crank Deg at 50thou lift

Open - Closing timing

because at the moment on both in/exh cams there is only 25thou lift at TDC an on the inlet side there is only 50thou lift 7.5deg ATDC, which he said is very out and should be more like 60-70thou lift at TDC(I think :D )

He said he just wants some were to start from.

The car make really good power till about 3500rpm and just not much after that.

This is all a bit over my head so sorry if i seem a bit vague, im still tryin to learn bout all this :D

SK - My turner said they seem to be too close and one needs to be advanced and the other retarded so ur 2deg advance on inlet and 4deg retard on exhaust sounds about right.

:) Cheers guys :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...