Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thats where it gets expensive. You cant really run the external gate housing unless you are willign to buy a greddy manifold and gate, which soon gets expensive.

Have you spoken to your mechanic/tuner? What do they think of the exhaust housing setup? An easier solution may be to cut out the centre section of the flanged face and drill and tap some new holes around the perimeter, then get a custom dump pipe made up...thinking about it that probably the better option

i am my own mechanic....and part tuner lol...i do everything almost myself with a little help from a mate with a dyno...yeah i was just looking at the rear housing maybe i could cut out a nice round section off the housing where the flange bolts onto. and on the dump pipe weld a plate the same shape as the peice cut off....so when you bolt the dump pipe on it blocks off the section to the wastegate creating a smooth flow....really it will just work like a housing with external gate....but then drill out that welded plate over the wastegate and just simply weld a screamer pipe off the back of the housing.....this should stop the flow out of the exhuast wheel getting interupted by square edges...while the wastegate can still let the vented air out of the housing via the screamer pipe......this might sound a bit confusing in words...

Yeh, id be inclined to cut out the entire centre section and just drill and tap a few extra botl holes over the wastegate sid eof things ...then have a nice big 3.5-4" Dump pipe.

If your little partition leaks a bit of air, then the screamer pipe can sound a bit ordinary/ ie Leaks

Be interesting to see how you go Waldo. I have a similar set up on my R32 GTS-t and i find it has the best of both worlds.

Like Roy's car mine is a daily driver as well and is very comfortable on the open road and is never harsh in traffic at all (all be it from the clutch :huh: )

and on the track i couldn't think of a better turbo that suits my needs (club/track days, motokarnha's and hill climbs and drift) as i dont change a single thing with set up except for tyres and some fuel.

The car is about to have a bit of a face lift due to some dodgy fuel that was acquired last week but hope to have it back on the road soon and will post up the new dyno sheets.

Look forward to seeing the numbers you get out of it and i dont htink you will be disappionted with the turbo at all, but like Roy has already mentioned i would do away with in the internal gate set up and go external. You will probably find in the long run with initional set up costs and if anything goes wrong or for modifications later on it will be a cheaper option???

Cheers B

anyways i got a quote from greddy....and for a new external gated exhaust housing they wanted $785 so i think im just gunna stick with the internal gate and dont bother modding the rear housing...obviously greddy/trust no more than us or they wouldnt be in business. i was looking at it and the exhaust wheel looks good...because it doesnt have overlap in the blades so hopefully that gives it sum strong top end power...and also when i was opening the wastegate with my fingers....the flap actualli sits on an angle when opened so that the exhuast coming outta it flows straight out into the turbine area.

mate that is one nasty looking turbo. there are so many things wrong with that turbine housing and wastegate set-up. I hope you got it very cheaply. also i would advise against the screamer pipe on an internal wastegate turbo. all the ones i have heard sounded like shit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...