R33GTRKid

is this motor still in your car and can be seen running?

f*kn legend man cheers, i cannot wait for next time with a proper tune and properly adjusted clutch.....

I do not think it is my forum at all and I enjoy being part of it, I understand it is a privilege and not a right being a mod on another forum with over 6,000 members. I understand the rules and I abide by them entirely (apart from that one indiscretion when I first joined and chatted in someone's for sale thread (which I thought as a new user I could have been given a friendly PM rather than a warn which I cannot get rid of). I also acknowledge that modification does not require justification to the modded but to other moderators if and when asked and agree with that protocol 100% if moderation is kept in check by other mods. there obviously needs to be an appropriate hierarchy or anarchy will reign..... my point is that if something happened, and someone told the truth about it, it can never be defamatory but I agree entirely that other third parties chipping in with hearsay etc should be deleted but why should the same apply for the person who first hand experienced the problem/issue and provided an truthful account of the event.

you guys need to get new legal advisors because you have been told a load of rubbish. Firstly, there is no such thing as libel or slander any longer, the new defamation acts in each state no longer differentiate between the two, they are simply called defamatory publications. In general terms, "subordinate distributors" will not be found liable if they can show they did not know the publication was defamatory and that this lack of knowledge was not due to any negligence on their part. Reasonableness is a relevant factor in determining whether an ISP has been negligent in failing, for example, to monitor material posted on its bulletin boards. Given the large volume of material on bulletin boards and the speed with which such material is posted, ISP's may argue it is an unreasonable burden to monitor all such material. The issue of what is reasonable in determining negligence becomes more straightforward once an ISP becomes aware of defamatory material posted on its bulletin boards and fails to remove such material within a reasonable time. Once an ISP becomes aware of defamatory material, it is more likely to be held liable if the ISP fails to remove it. This has been translated that a website cannot ordinarily be sued until a business or someone else has asked for the alleged defamatory publication to be removed. Then and only then after failing to remove the alleged defamatory publication within the said time frame can the forum be sued. It is the defence of innocent dissemination. Secondly there are a plethora of defences available to an alleged defamatory publication, including truth and a reasonable belief in the opinion expressed. The shops/business can always have the right of reply in a public forum which is another defence. Importantly recent amendments to legislation in Australia ( Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) provide internet content hosts and ISPs with some measure of protection from liability for hosting or carrying defamatory material. This legislation seemingly overrides civil liabilities arising under legislation as well as under rules of common law and equity. Again the defence is not available if the internet content host or the ISP is aware of the defamatory nature of the content which it hosts or carries. Persons defamed in web pages or on bulletin boards could therefore potentially deprive internet content hosts and ISP's of the benefit of the defence in respect of future publications of the offending web page or bulletin boards by putting them on notice of the fact that they are hosting or carrying material which is defamatory. I carefully read over all of the comments made (from the point of view of a solicitor who sues on behalf of people said to have been defamed) and there was nothing but truth and/or reasonably grounds for the opinions expressed. One point of view would be to say that all forums (not just SAU) should stop hiding behind legal falsities or incorrect assumptions about possible liability, as over moderation is a bad thing, it stops the forum from serving its purpose, that is allowing its members to freely discuss and express opinions on issues dear to their hearts. The policy should be, firstly you need to air your grievance with the shop or business before you make it public and then if you get no joy, you can provide an honest and truthful account of your problem. Afterall the shop can reply if it chooses! that is my $0.02, take it as you will or whack it with the mod stick, either way is fine

wow I have no idea what you meant with 'but the projector type is D2S. My low beam's are xenon and work fine, the high beams on the other hand are not, they are a shitty yellow type light.

will they fit into the high beam of a R33 GTR with xenons?

Okay price reductions: 2 x stock turbos - $400 ono stock cams & Cam gears- $250 ono 6 x Stock injectors - $250 ono 2 x stock dumps - $75 ono 1x stock fuel pump - $50 1 x stock front pipes - $50 6 x stock coil packs - $150 1 x OEM window wiper spray bottle and motor - $25 1 x OEM ECU - $150 1 x OEM clutch, flywheel and pressure plate, I am told this is in excellent condition - $200 1 x turbo to intercooler pipe (one with twin turbo on it) - $100 2 x OEM Air Flow Meters - excellent condition, nil damage to wires - $250 or $125 ea

like that road that runs around the back of Lake Herdsman - Powis Street turns into it, Haydon Bunton drive or something, any more than 80 kays on there and you almost go airborne. Although I have not been past there in a few weeks, I do not recall that intersection being that lumpy. Nothing like wanneroo road and green street, that one is psycho if you come from walcott and cross wanneroo into green street

well i finally got some decent pics of the GTR thanks to Mickey yesterday so thought I would update:

wicked day, great to meet you guys, MattyP you are a champ. Pictures are awesome dood too, thanks heaps oh and Adorra, Rokeby road is so full of speed bumps lol

to me?

wtf would they crush it? I mean really, with all the starving kids around the world, why do they not raffle it as a non road going car and give the proceeds to charity. Nissan FTL

i was going to say $50 but meh

because they are deemed to be not non-slip, meaning your feet can slip off them in the wet and therefore a safety hazard. ditto if they are only 'attached' to your existing pedals and not replacing them fully

The gauge holder and OEM right a pillar surround has gone. Manifolds gone pending payment. Offers on other stuff guys, will take all reasonable ones.....!

scratch that I just read it is at South Street Park n Ride, carry on

are there any tickets left for this? if so can i snag 2?

that is all... actually no wait, in the following picture, please substitute your head for mine and you get my drift:

Will u sell some games, if some are latest I'll pay 50 each

Could I please be changed to R33GTRKid

how does the baffle work, I am going to DMV tomorrow to get some permits and it is wayyyyyyyyyy to loud at the moment, prolly cos of the mines stainless front and decat but meh, the kaki sounds horn I reckon

bump, offers welcome

I also have the a-pillar cover to which the trust 2 pod holder was fixed to save you hacking yours up

chasing the steering column and ignition barrel plastic surround, can you pls post up a pic of it. I am 99% sure this willfit 33 GTR, if in mint nick ill give you $50posted

Mods can this please be deleted as I could not edit any of my posts so started a new one with pics