Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He knows his stuff and he's a jap enthusiast, unlike the only SA ecu chipper who simply doesn't appear to give to sh*ts about jap cars these days. Its all V8's, black jeans and thongs for him. :rolleyes:

Nice call joel, the SA guy now bags out small jap engines, he seems to have forgotten that turbos originate from japanese cars and if it wasn't for the import scene he probably wouldn't have a turbo bolted to the side of a LS1 V8.........

Nice figure but no one can ever really trust there output...all it takes if for them to set it up with u being above sea level or what ever u go and u can grap and extra 30hp....

All dynamics dynos are equal in shootout mode. That is why they implemented it, so that tuners could accurately compare results. It's not right when people say...."oh but on Joe Bloggs dyno it reads less (or more) than it really is". If it's in shootout mode - everyone is equal.

Edited by 3lit3 32
All dynamics dynos are equal in shootout mode. That is why they implemented it, so that tuners could accurately compare results. It's not right when people say...."oh but on Joe Bloggs dyno it reads less (or more) than it really is". If it's in shootout mode - everyone is equal.

Not quite. There are still variables that have to be entered by the operator (such as the barometric pressure as mentioned), as well as the temp correcton on the intake temp that can be used to fudge results.

Something for you to have a look at on shootout printouts is the difference between room or ambient temp (RT or AT) vs intake temp (IT) and consider that an 8 degree difference between ambient and intake netted me about 10rwkw on the print out.

I'm often a bit sceptical when there is a difference of more than 10 degrees considering mine was an unenclosed pod and the car had completed about 10 200rwkw plus runs and only recorded a difference of 8 degrees. I recently saw a 250 plus rwkw s14 go through the same situation with the same sort of temp increase. As a result, that is often the second thing i look at when a dyno sheet seems to be a touch high (first being the power figure).

My air temp vs intake temp was 30 deg vs 34 deg which would sound about right. I didn't ask the guy for a straight out power run, I asked him to check AFR's....

The only bad thing to come out of it was that my car now seems to have a very slight miss when idleing which wasn't there before.... seems to miss in quite a random fashion..... not like its missing on 1 cylinder every time, just sometimes.... but I can live with that if the car runs fine through to redline. I'll probably need new coils in the future.

I think I may settle for an old SAFC in the future too.... I really only need to move my AFR from sitting on pretty much consistant 10:1 all the way to redline, up to 11.5 AFR. I think it would be pretty simple with an old SAFC.

Fixxxer :P

I would lose the ecu mate.

I reckon the timing map would look pretty nasty, it would be sailing pretty close to the wind. Thats something a SAFC is not going to fix either.

3 things you should always have tuned with a margin for error;

1) AFR

2) Boost

3) Timing

Each one yeilds more power as it approaches the danger zone. In your case the lowish boost and rich AFR's are probably helping things, I wouldn't be in a hurry to go leaning things out with a S-AFC.

D'oh, not something I wanted to hear.

The guy who dyno'd the car said there was "already a lot of timing on it" when I asked him about the timing.

He also had the other workshop guy lean over/into the engine bay and listen..... for what I gather was any pinging that may have been occuring. He did this for the last 2 dyno runs and the guy gave it the thumbs up for both runs.

I'm starting to reconsider any more mods and only give it a boot full when the weather is cooler or night driving, just to be safe, this is after all, my daily driven, I don't want to break anything. My old car had the same power but only weighed 930kg, gotta get used to a larger/heavier car and live with it.

Fixxxer :P

D'oh, not something I wanted to hear. 

The guy who dyno'd the car said there was "already a lot of timing on it" when I asked him about the timing.

He also had the other workshop guy lean over/into the engine bay and listen..... for what I gather was any pinging that may have been occuring.  He did this for the last 2 dyno runs and the guy gave it the thumbs up for both runs.

I'm starting to reconsider any more mods and only give it a boot full when the weather is cooler or night driving, just to be safe, this is after all, my daily driven, I don't want to break anything.  My old car had the same power but only weighed 930kg, gotta get used to a larger/heavier car and live with it.

Fixxxer :P

I'm sure they knew what they were doing but they should have known better.

The closer you put your head to the engine...the harder it is to hear pinging.

You can hear pinging a lot clearer from 10 meters away than you can from 10cm.

I hope they have done the right thing by you on the tune as I know of plenty of tuners who just blow through it and don't actually spend the time needed.

Cubes,

I reckon he needs to ditch the jap chipped ecu before he goes and gets a S-afc. Why touch the AFRs if you are running a mickeys hair away from detonation on the timing map?

Swap/sell the ECU and get a stockie + SAFC is a solution but, the adjustable timing map is a top thing to have. Re-map the ecu locally is a very good idea if thats something he can do.

Hey guys....

Just to get back to my ECU, I never had the ECU mapped.... its the ECU that came with the car when I bought it, so no tuning was done when I had the car dyno'd.

I've been thinking about it lots and taking peoples advice... If I did get a SAFC I would take timing out of the car to be safe with the leaner mixtures. I'm probably going to put it back to 0.6bar on my Profec for everyday driving anyways.

Fixxxer :P

Unfortunately if the ecu in the car has jap chip in it, the actual timing map is going to remain even if you retard the base timing. The S-AFC in that case might be one step forward two steps back.

Dropping the boost down to 0.6 bar gives you some head room to adjust the AFR's using a S-AFC however. The S-AFC II can also monitor knock levels.

Ok here's a new question which is a bit controversial.

Should I run on Shell Optimax Extreme 100 to be even safer? (In terms of the possible jap ignition advance on it)

Ohhh and does anyone know what all the stuff means on my early model Profec. Its got 3 small dials on it on the right, an overtake boost button, a nob that seems to go in 0.2bar increments of boost and a red LED panel that reads -.5 on idle and varies as I accelerate, I don;t think it ever makes it into positive readings, but when I'm on boost I'm usually looking at the road :(:)

Could I set my boost from 0.8bar to 0.6 bar and just use the "overtake boost" button if I want to give it a little?

How long does it last for? How much extra boost do I get???

I tried doing a search before but came back with lots of Profec B II stuff...

Fixxxer :)

Edited by Fixxxer
  • 2 weeks later...

*shrug*

It does blow a teeny bit of black smaoke up high on boost, so I don't have a reason to think its not running rich to some extent.

And it does feel strong up top. I guess the only way to compare to other cars is to go to a dyno day and compare with others on the same dyno, same day thing.

Fixxxer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...