Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As you come off the throttle it uses load points that have most probably not been tuned, as a result slightly detonating.

This is very hard to replicate on the dyno, one good reason the car must be taken for a street run to ensure everything is a.o.k.

One easy fix is to rip out 5degree's. If it does it thenyou know she's running a little too much ign. timing in the cells above the cells that wot uses.

Edited by Cubes

as cubes said when you back off the throttle and clutch in theres a brief moment where the airflow meter "load" will drop but revs will at the same range so youll be in cell area say 15 across ish and 4 or 5 down which wont be tuned. a map trace would easily show you which cells and then you could just take out a few degrees there

as cubes said when you back off the throttle and clutch in theres a brief moment where the airflow meter "load" will drop but revs will at the same range so youll be in cell area say 15 across ish and 4 or 5 down which wont be tuned. a map trace would easily show you which cells and then you could just take out a few degrees there

No i am not hitting rev limiter, and it is slightly rectified when i quick shift, yes.

So obviously my tuner hasnt done a proper job? He should fix this free of charge? i just got the PFC n tune on friday...

As I said earlier.. its pretty hard to get it spot on unless you take it for a good road test, which many tuners don't. Even then under some rare circumstances such as brisk hills driving you may find your self using a load point that isn't usually used as a result it may have a slightly higher detonation reading.

Its hard to get it spot on. Takes time and tweaking.

As I said earlier.. its pretty hard to get it spot on unless you take it for a good road test, which many tuners don't. Even then under some rare circumstances such as brisk hills driving you may find your self using a load point that isn't usually used as a result it may have a slightly higher detonation reading.

Its hard to get it spot on. Takes time and tweaking.

Fair enough, we took it for a road test though with the laptop connected doing a map trace, no green highlighted sections... at one stage knock went up to 88 (not while tuning this was last night)

Edited by Suspense
When changing gears i get a KNock spike on my PFC of about 60~80 sometimes...

Is this spike in between gear changes normal, or is something wrong?

Knock with throttle closed is irrelevant, no engine damage possible. Move on.

:D cheers :D

and it is slightly rectified when i quick shift, yes.

Most off us roll off the throttle quickly, we don't simply jump off it having it completely closed within a couple ms, I had to drop 2 degree's from the 2 load points above the load points used at WOT, around 3000-3500rpm from memory.

If I were to change and slap the gears quick i would not experience high knock readings. At first I suspected fuel injectors but it wasn't.

Edited by Cubes

hey got a queston simlair topic any replies appricates with my power fc when running down through the gear ie engin breaking i get quite high knock ratings ie 40 withc is much highte then even when ime on it hard i get readings of like 15 thanks guys for your replys

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...