Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah, it sounds like a bit of over kill. The only reason I could fit the big cooler in mine was because I've got a GTR front on mine.

Give you heaps more space up front.

Decide on what power goals you want, then find a cooler to suit them.

No use getting a 650x300x110 core if your only going to run a little more boost.

J

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10286-your-cooler-size/#findComment-163774
Share on other sites

Well i am going to get my turbo high flowed to t03/4 spec, n i'm hoping for around 240-50rwkw in the end with turbo, power fc and fuel upgrade. The thing i thought was good about this cooler though was that it is long but not tall therefore it will have a good pressure drop because it isn't traveling verticaly as far and is traveling straighter, plus bar and plate sounds pretty good. The only option i can go is 600*300*90 which works out the same anyway roughly because for the rise in height i lose the length, so doesn't make much difference eh as aposed to 670*245? Most coolers i look at no matter the manufacturer its about 600*300 as the standard cooler core size. In particular to help explain i am looking at the hyperflow s15 cooler and custom fitting it to my skyline, as they have a very neat cooler. check it out at http://www.hyperflow.com.au n check the s15 cooler to see what i mean. L8ters, J.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10286-your-cooler-size/#findComment-164083
Share on other sites

Power wise not much, I am yet to dyno the beast.

Mods.

PFC with Boost Kit.

Cam sprokets

Dump pipes HKS

550cc Inj

Larger intercooler

47.5mm High flow turbo's with steel shaft.

3.25" exhaust.

Track Mods

3 Core Brass Radiatior

300x200x40 oil cooler

Sump Baffel

Head retrictor

3000lb Brass button clutch

Kevlar Brake pads

Yoka 255 A-Spec tyres.

Im currently running .65 Bar and I want to dyno it up around 1.3 or until I run out of duty Cycle.

Last trackday I only got 1 unhindered lap and my passanger clocked a 1.52 Lap, My brake upgrade should pull me down into the 1.40's.

Blew my apexi up with an electrical fault about 4 weeks ago so I am running the stock computer with the old Inj while it is getting fixed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10286-your-cooler-size/#findComment-166120
Share on other sites

Alothough the intercooler is large it not as big in volume as a 4" trust or alike.

760 x 360 x 72 mm = 19700cm3

A large trust would be

600 x 300 x 120 = 21600cm3

So they are about 10% bigger, I went for cooling affect, with a larger surface area. Think about the efficency of a 4" FMIC by the time a the air is trying to cool the last inch of the core.

I know I dont get above 50 Deg inlet temp on a 30+ day at the Creek.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10286-your-cooler-size/#findComment-166127
Share on other sites

talking about coolers i saw 1 big ass 1 on a supra yesterday at ice performance (1 of the owners just imported it), it was 130mm thick and took up the whole front end of the car, but it was runnin twin t66's and all the other goodies, it pulled 300rwkw at 1 bar untuned, they r putin in a motec system and winding up boost to close to 2 bar for well over 400rwkw!! Then i understood y it had such a big ass cooler on the front! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10286-your-cooler-size/#findComment-166259
Share on other sites

If you get around 600x300x75 you'll be fine EVEN with the stock turbo, some people will have you believe that your turbo can't flow enough air through this intercooler and that you'd be better off with a small one, even the stock one (yeah) but the fact is that my car made more power with this intercooler than with the stockie, so if things aren't flowing properly how come I'm making more power? You can't have one without the other I say.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10286-your-cooler-size/#findComment-168396
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...