Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was just in the diy section and couldn find much.

i would like to know if any one has fitted direct fit side feed injectors of larger the stock capacity into their rb25det?

what i was wondering could this be done at home?

is it possible to get at injectors without removing top of plenum?

thought i have heard the job is risky has any one had prolems?

also i have a power fc now i'd have to work out the new flow rate so it can adjusted has anyone done this the driven there car to a workshop for a tune?

any light on this type of subject would be very helpfull

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/104170-am-injectors-into-rb25/
Share on other sites

hey Ben,

Many jap-brands sell direct-fit injectors for rb25det, i just bought some NISMO 740cc injectors which are direct fit.

I went to fit them today, and found the job abit complex, but the looks of it there are 4 nuts on the underside of the plenum which will need some-sort of tool which can bend into that place.

Once those 4nuts on the bottomside are remove it looks like you just have to plugs the hose etc and then remove the fuel rail and replace the injectors (i was advise its best to take the fuel-rail off the car which changing the injectors)

Im going to give to another go 2morrow, and see if i can find a tool which will undo those bolts :rolleyes:

Cheers Michael :D

Ps i was quote by a local workshop $300 to change the injectors

I recently fitted some Nismo 555cc injectors to my RB25. Initial attempts to undo the fuel rail bolts without removing anything proved fruitless and I found it was MUCH easier once I removed the throttle body. Access to the fuel rail bolt below the throttle body and the fuel injector plugs is much better.

A word of caution, once the fuel rail is free and the injectors are clear, be careful not to hit the end of the fuel injectors on any hard objects as the pintel caps break easily (as I discovered with injector 6). Obviously the same applies when installing the new injectors.

I think you will struggle to slide the fuel rail out the front of the engine if the throttle body is in place. Incidentally I am assuming the motor is in the car.

Removing the injectors from the fuel rail is easiest done by placing 2 flat head screwdrivers in the slot on either side of the injector and carefully leveraging against something placed under the screwdrivers.

Once the injectors are installed (with new O-rings!) you can re-install the fuel rail. I recommend buying a new metal gasket for the throttle body (about $30 from Nissan).

Hope this helps.

Cheers

Edited by BH_SLO32
I recently fitted some Nismo 555cc injectors to my RB25. Initial attempts to undo the fuel rail bolts without removing anything proved fruitless and I found it was MUCH easier once I removed the throttle body. Access to the fuel rail bolt below the throttle body and the fuel injector plugs is much better.

so you didnt remove the plenum at all? just took the Throttle body off then you were able to remove the fuel rail?

im going to give this a shot 2morrow :D

Not all that hard, just finniky. You don't need to split or remove the plenum, just the throttle body and the AAC valve assembly.

But be very careful you don't lose the insulating washers between the fuel rail and the manifold. They sit in a machined groove and are easy to dislodge.

Before you start, clean the area and give it a good blow with compressed air and be extra careful nothing drops in the open manifold once the rail is out.

Take the opportunity to replace that impossible to get at fuel hose at the rear of the rail.

There is probably some tool to remove the injectors from the rail but having nothing like that, I installed longer injector retaining studs then popped each one out using compressed air. The plastic collets on the pintle valves are super fragile.

New nitrile "O" rings and it all goes back OK.

Dial in your new duty cycle in the PFC. In my case using Nismo 555's the ratio is 370/555=67%, I used 70% and the lag time is the same as Nissan so that's good.

It will then run perfectly for your trip to the dyno.

Thanks to SK for the injector info.

so you didnt remove the plenum at all? just took the Throttle body off then you were able to remove the fuel rail?

im going to give this a shot 2morrow :P

That is correct, throttle body only. Grigor also raised some good points especially about the insulating washers, don't drop them or you could be searching for them for a while.

Cheers

From memory it's Settings then Inj.

You should see the 6-injector duty cycle and lag times.

Go down each one and alter the duty cycle accordingly.

For the Nismo 555's I used 70%

The 67% maths presumes your old injectors were actually good for 370cc's. They may have been doing more or less, but it will drive to the dyno very nicely at 70%

when i replaced mine i took the top half of the plenium off...that was by far the longest part of the job. Its a bit fidely, but straight forward, should be able to get it done in less than a day, took me a few hours plus drink & food stops....lol. Take the advice above an should be pretty right, nothing more i can really add. Old injectors are quite brittle, so take care removing em if you plan to keep or sell em. I broke 2 :) oops..

good luck

like me just clarify cause i need to drive 4 hours to preferred tuner

what looks to be easiest remove top half plenum

carefully replace injectors

now to the confusing part

im using 600cc so 370/600=0.62(rounded up)

does this mean i change all my inj duties to 62% in my pfc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...