Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking the twin 3037s will be a bit of a goer with the .74 exhaust housing.

"We're looking to make 450awkw with out too much boost yet trying to have as little lag as possible."

a turbo capable of making 300kw at the rubber (or more) on its own, isnt the best choice for 450kw if you want response

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm glad its not my money ! From other peoples hearsay the TO4Z would be a straightforward single solution and far cheaper than twin turbos - particularly twin HKS's .

If you want more or don't like TO4 P trim turbines there are a couple of alternatives in the US , firstly the GT3567R From Full Race.com and secondly the 4067R from I think Precision Turbo .

The GT3567R is basically a GT35R with the same compressor (TO4R 84mm 63T) as the TO4R/Z turbos .

The GT4067R is a GT40R with the same compressor as the one above . It also uses the large TO4 flange as can the TO4R/Z .

I think either of these would be more responsive than a GT35R with either the 94mm or 102mm compressors from the GT42R/T51R KAI/SPL . If an 84mm big trim compressor can push the air you want why chase a larger 94 or 102mm one ?

Actually just had a sticky at the maps - a GT35R might just about get there depending on turbine housing a/r and drive line losses , the 3567R should romp it in .

Cheers A .

You will be very lucky to get more than 410rwkw out of the .82

housing Gt35r, the 1.06 woudn't make to much more,

So To4Z or 94mm exducer Gt42., unless you use something from Precision inbetween

Judging by what they say in the US, the twin 2835 kit sounds laggy for the power it

makes.

cheers

darren

Fair enough , the map I was looking at shows ~ 62lbs airflow at ~ 23.5lbs boost . Output would vary with different engines , tuning , state of tune .

The 7/14 blade GT40's 88mm compressor map shows about 68lbs flow and the word is that the 84mm TO4R does 75lbs of flow . My preferences only , 88 GT40 more blades than is good for response and turbine efficiency + requires huge comp cover , 84mm TO4R wheel pumps more air and can use more compact comp cover - AND 6/12 blades good for reasons already mentioned . Everyone that uses TO4Z's (same comp) can't sing enough praise for its compressor and its non surging characteristics .

Cheers A .

I'll just straighten the whole Hypertune scene out.

Hypertune used to share the same facility as BD4's, they were never the same company. BD4's never worked on any of Hypertunes cars, where as Hypertune did a lot of work on BD4's cars.

As for Hypertune i get a lot of work performed by the guys down there at Taren point.

They produce all of their own gear using CNC mills and CNC mandrel benders.

I'm sure they won't mind if you go round to their factory to see what they do.

As for 3037's being a bit laggy has anyone got experience with these turbos?

any help would be great.

Cheers

since you seem to have missed the point of a lot of people

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...c=34855&hl=3037

If ONE 3037 can crank over 300rwkw (just one thread of many above as the example)

Then TWO would get you into the 550-650rwkw mark.

You goal is 450rwkw, get better matched single.

You asked for response, do you really want response?

If you did you wouldnt be thinking two monster twins.

I agree, if you want ultimate response, go the big single with moderate cams. Then again, more info is required on your engine specs: capacity, cams, etc

2835's are not as responsive as say 2530's or a GT35 or TO4R/Z unless you have a 2.8L or RB30, and even then they will still have a significant amount of lag. With the 3037S's they will only be laggier and less responsive.

Disco's suggestions sound very tempting also as improved response can be had with minimal power sacrifices.

You could make things simpler by going for GTRS's.

When people talk single 3037s they normally have a large housing like WRX i know wich has a 1.12 ex housing

where as for a street GTR we would run twin .74. i don't want to run big boost either that why i want a slightly larger turbo.

I'm looking a t running about 15-20psi.

You wouldn't be running any more than 20 psi on pump fuel on the street anyway. The most used housing on a single 3037s would be the 0.87 for the street anyway. 1.12 would be laggier for a street car. Twin 3037S's will make 450awkw quite easily on 20 psi.

However, similar power can be made using a single T04Z. :rolleyes:

Question is, how much response do you want to sacrifice?

Can't really believe this hasn't been asked

what will the car be used for?

Dyno/boasting/something to talk about

Drag

Track

Street

as the midrange you'll get from the big twins at low boost 20psi compared to smaller say low mounts or single turbo such as t04z at the same boost will easily make them faster then the big twins that aren't running efficiently

Its normal use is just for driving to work and so on.

but for us to make 367kw we have to run 27psi

i know the turbos will have more lag but as someone else said

20psi on those turbos should make around 450kw.

Have you seen this thread?: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...opic=93880&st=0

Plenty of different RB26 cobinations and their respective graphs.

If you are going to use this car for normal everyday use, why do you want 450awkw on 20 psi with minimal lag, especially using a high mount twin set up? It doesn't sound like you want it for drag or racing use, unless you plan on taking it for a blast every now and then. But you have specified very high power with quite stringent parameters. For an every day street car, 450awkw is lethal. I dont think that it is achievable unless you term "minimal lag" as being 5K+ as you won't see much boost below that with twin high mounts (3037S's).

It will also cost you almost twice as much to achieve it with a twin set up than a single.

I know lag is a big thing, but if power hits at 5000rpm thats fine beause we will be reving it out to 9000rpm

The guys down at Hypertune will be performing all the work on the car,

They have been in cars with these turbos, and asure me with the right tune make 800hp no worries.

450rwkw is not 850hp

Do you want 450rwkw or 850hp?

If your rev'ing the guts to 9000rpm, then i'd say drop back 1000rpm and use boost.

IF you've got a motor to handle big revs, it'll handle a mild amount of boost

If you decide to use HKS's GT3037's I'd give serious thought to using the 52 compressor trim version (cartridge no 700177-0006) . They work out to be a better balance of compressor load to turbine power and if the SR boys can get nearly 400 Hp out of them in single form its more than you probably need in twin form . Also from memory HKS did a 48 compressor trim version but I don't think anyones ever seen one . HKS do T28 flanged housings for them in .61 and .73 a/r as well so my guess would be .73's .

It still seems a lot of turbo for the 600 odd Hp , what do twin 2530's get you if the manifolds and turbine housings are cleaned up and good dumps and cams are used ? Would be a lot cheaper and use a bit more of what you already own if its enough .

Also glad its not me paying for the driveline to support it ...

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...