Jump to content
SAU Community

400awkw R32 Gt-r With Minimal Lag? Help Plz Ideas/


zErTeK[2k]
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

im in search of 400awkw in my r32 gtr i am curious tho as to how i would go about making that kind of power without having to much lagg to go with it i am wanting to stay with twins not go a big single for response reasons( i believe it to be correct that 2 smaller twins will get on boost before 1 large single? ) any ideas and/or suggestions would be muchly appreciated

thanx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends if thats what the parts are going to cost labor will be done my myself and my mechanic so no labor costs was hoping that will bring it down substantially

i was thinking mayb twin 2835r's on custom manifolds with the proper internals and injectors etc but i am unsure and was after some feedback or ideas on what to go with and when it comes to internals which would be best for reliability purposes?

thanx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

400 - t04z

search on "t04z"

your gonna need a full rebuild, with at the least a set of good pistons and all the other stuff that goes into a solid motor... and they aint cheap.

Then comes all the extra bits

fuel pump

injectors

ecu (plus addition sensors, depending)

afm's (depending)

clutch etc etc

thats just to get started aswell

Maybe have a search of the RB26 dyno thread too, wont hurt to have a read

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As posted by Cubes - engine capacity is your friend when trying to minimse lag at higher horsepower.

Consider a stroker kit (HKS, Tomei, Jun etc), RB30 bottom end or an OS 3 litre if money is no object.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My car would pretty much fit the guidelines for that, T04Z on a fully built motor. Comes on quicker than standard turbos did when it was stock.

(PS: Will be for sale soon... engine is 1000km old :rolleyes:, wouldn't wish the costs of modification on anyone, its a long road!!)

Edited by Morgs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is so many setup available now that will provide responce. The only question here is will they provide the target of 400kw? There are single setups and twin setups that will do the job, you will firstly need to choose what type you would prefer as there is no point suggesting a single turbo if you want a twin setup or vice a versa.

As for engine capacity, well if your building a whole engine then you can look at possible increase in capacity, if not then it should not be discussed, what would be the point as you don't have to increase capacity to acheive responce & 400kw.

Twin setup - HKS 2530's are well known for responce and high HP, they'll hit the 400kw+

Single setup - T04Z (HKS or Garrett) Also well known for responce and high HP, seen 468kw with these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well the shopping list atm looks like this :

arias forged pistons

rods ( unsure which brand to go...suggestions? )

hks F-con V-pro ( most likely i have heard they are better than Power FC at higher power levels that may be wrong tho )

GReddy Plenum

hks 272 cams

hks cam gears

as for fuel i am unsure atm but i am thinking 1000cc injectors are going to be needed and a nice fuel rail so any suggestions on those would be great

this is what i have written down on paper so bits and pieces may change over time when i do a little bit more research

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well the shopping list atm looks like this :

arias forged pistons

rods ( unsure which brand to go...suggestions? )

hks F-con V-pro ( most likely i have heard they are better than Power FC at higher power levels that may be wrong tho )

GReddy Plenum

hks 272 cams

hks cam gears

as for fuel i am unsure atm but i am thinking 1000cc injectors are going to be needed and a nice fuel rail so any suggestions on those would be great

this is what i have written down on paper so bits and pieces may change over time when i do a little bit more research

We made 404 AWKW on pump gas with 2530's...28psi. HKS full kit...dumps/mani./piping...5 inch thick cooler...720cc injectors... 3 bosch fuel pumps...Power FC.

Engine was all Nissan except Arias pistons and tomei 260 cams.

What you dont need is the Greddy plenum, 272 cams, rods are only optional as correctly prepped stockers are certainly up to the task...just make sure ARP fasteners are used.

Feel free to pm if you need a hand.

Paul

P.S. We constantly made between 440-460 when pushed with C16 and 34psi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Trail braking done right, should have the rear unsettled, such that you're actually turning the car by a noticeable amount WITH the brakes, and hence noticeably less steering input.
    • No you don't. Just no more driving in the wet, and clean your window manually before you drive
    • I'm not sure if they tick your boxes, but Haltech would be my pick. I'm an Adaptronic guy from way back, and Haltech acquired Adaptronic to basically get Andy, AND his IP on how he does things like fuel modelling etc.
    • Just on this, as there's a huge issue in your assumption Dose.   The logic you've given, is the same logic old school NA guys give for "needing back pressure" in an exhaust. If you free up an exhaust system, and keep injecting the same fuel in etc, at the same timing, you'll typically drop power. Freeing the exhaust will often make an engine want a little bit more timing, and even sometimes a little more fuel, but then it'll make even more power.   There's many mods people do and "get no extra power" when running a comparison on the same tune. Imagine a car tuned for 91, but now we say put 98 in it, see no difference. But as we now have 98 fuel, you can run more timing, and make more power, as the 91 was knock limited.   So just be very wary in your claim of "don't retune it and do a back to back and you'll see". The correct approach would be tune the car with stock manifold, swap the manifold to aftermarket, and retune it again. But no one wants to do that, and all the results we get are "this was stock, and this is manifold changed and tuned" and people put it all down as just the tune doing it.
    • Unplug ECU. Unplug TPS. Unplug boost pressure sensor. Now, all the wires, placing your ground (black) multimeter lead at the ECU end, measure resistance of the 5V line at the boost sensor plug. Then do the same to the TPS plug. Then do the same for all the other wires that relate to the TPS, or boost sensor.   All of your measurements should be very very low. You're looking to see if wiring is out of wack here.   Secondly, from memory on the R33 (not a neo motor, so I'm assuming an r34) the ground wire for the TPS and boost sensor are NOT equal to ground of the car/battery. IE, DO NOT connect ground of the sensor to the engine/body of car. You'll get a ground loop, and/or potentially screw shit up. In electronics, ground for a circuit, is not necessarily equal to ground of another circuit.   So this leads me to ask, when measuring your 5V, how are you getting 1.5V? Where are your multimeter leads touching for both the red and black lead on the multimeter?   If you're measuring power on the sensor wire, and putting ground on the car chassis or negative battery terminal, that could be all of your issues in "getting 1.5v". Electronics engineers can do some funky stuff with circuits, and when both sensors are on, it's enough laid to alter how the ECU is functioning.
×
×
  • Create New...