Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

currently been thinking about upgrading my HKS GT-RS turbo on my R33 GTST. im after the 320 rwkw make but dont want a laggy ass turbo. Currently making 260rwkw and bored of it.

What turbo's have you people seen make 320rwkw without too much lag (preferably HKS turbos). considering the HKS 3040 but not too sure on how it goes.

any help/dyno graphs will be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/
Share on other sites

320rwkw shouldn't be difficult to achieve with the HKS3040R or Garrett equivalent provided you do have a built engine. I think there are a few people on here who can personally vouch for that...

I've got a GT3040R on my R33 making around 280rwkw on 17psi (see dyno graph below). I've only got a std bottom end, so I haven't really pushed the limits of the turbo too much at this stage, but there's definately potential to make a lot more power.

Obviously it's not going to be as responsive as your current set up, but full boost by just over 4000rpm isn't too bad when you making approx 300rwkw.

Hope that helps :rolleyes:

post-10992-1139663951.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1942129
Share on other sites

The Garrett GT3040R is rated is 600hp.

SEE HERE

I also forgot to mention that i have the 0.82a/r turbine housing, so I guess you could go for the 0.63a/r if you wanted less lag, although power would come on like a light switch which would make traction a bit of a problem. The 0.82 is nice and progressive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1943555
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the 0.63 choke the top end too much and stop you from getting to 320?

What about the GT2835 Pro S with the 0.87 rear housing? That should get you there.

What was B-Man running when he had 330rwkw? Was that the 2835 or the 3040?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1944036
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the 0.63 choke the top end too much and stop you from getting to 320?

I used to think that 300+ would be pushing it with the 0.63, but after seeing Wilchs results in the rb25 dyno thread - i.e mid 270's @ 16-17psi with a .63 GT30R on rb25 w/std internals (I think?) - I guess 300 could be possible with a little more boost and a rebuilt engine.

What was B-Man running when he had 330rwkw? Was that the 2835 or the 3040?

I think it was a HKS3040R from what I remember when I was researching a while ago (may be wrong)
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1944288
Share on other sites

1.0 Japanese PS = 0.98632 BHP

actually PS is not a japanese measurement. i dunno where you got that from but it's the (old) german standard of horsepower. it stands for Pferdestärke which i am quite positive is not japanese. basically means horse power in german.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1945350
Share on other sites

That had a lot of stuff done to it to get that.

An R33 RB25 head isn't the most amazing piece of gear and it's still only 2.5 litres.  Imagine how peaky 300-350rwkw would be.  Sounds ilke a waste of time if you ask me.

I'd agree. Much over 300rwkw and its gonna be peaky.

My setup (in my opinion) with the 600hp GT30 was as late as i would want a turbo to come on (4200/4500rpm/17psi)

With a redline of high 7000's thats not the "greatest"

Hence why im RB26, aiming for 330rwkw but rather than 4500rpm, it'll be more like 3500rpm, with a MUCH broader span of power, with 240rwkw in before 3000rpm (where rb25 was more like 150rwkw) based on results of other cars with a setup similar to me

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1945579
Share on other sites

Turbo's aside...

Have you considered using an RB30 bottom end?

If I ever had to rebuild my engine, I'd seriously contemplate going that way as the RB30 bottom end should definately give a much broader power band than the RB25. Add in a GT30 or GT35 turbo (with the usual supporting mods) and 320rwkw should be a formality. The bonus being that the power is usuable over a large part of the rev range as opposed to having peak power at the top of the rev range and not much else for the rest of it if you had the same power with the RB25.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105432-upgrading-turbo/#findComment-1946895
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Mainly being afraid of breaking something on something i've poured so much money into haha
    • Hey   ive gone for a terminated harness on my build so selling brand new unused and unopened piggy back harness  https://www.haltech.com/product/ht-141357-elite-2000-2500-nissan-skyline-r32-33-r34-gt-r/ Located Bathurst NSW   price $600 + postage     
    • The trigger kit I have is similar to the one in the link below. While going through Facebook, I saw someone else mention a similar issue, and I’m starting to think this could be related to the crank gear itself. I understand these parts are CNC machined, but maybe some earlier versions or individual pieces might have slight inconsistencies—it just doesn’t look right in my case. https://www.facebook.com/share/16an8evZd9/?mibextid=wwXIfr I originally installed the crank gear using the thin OEM washer, but as shown in the attached photo, the timing belt walks very close to the edge. When I tried using a Nitto washer—which is thicker—it actually made the issue worse. The belt walks about 1mm off the front edge, which raises more concern about alignment.   I’ve gone through the full process of elimination:   The tensioner pulley and bolt are brand new and installed correctly. The bolt isn’t bent and is oriented properly. The back of the tensioner and the idler pulley are clean and seated correctly. The idler sits slightly more forward, which I understand is due to its design. I’ve experimented with both tight and loose belt tension, but it makes no difference. As soon as the engine runs, the belt immediately walks forward again—even if I reset it beforehand.     At this point, I’m considering replacing the crank gear with your Race Version 1 (12-tooth), but before purchasing, I wanted to ask:   Are you aware of any alignment issues when using this gear? Would this gear help keep the belt aligned correctly, or could the walking still occur? Does it work with a standard missing-tooth crank and rear washer? Is there any specific crank setup or install procedure required?     For reference, I’m not using a front washer, as the PRP crank gear seems to replace the need for one.   Looking forward to your advice.
    • Yep, looks that way. Never driven an E30 or R31 so I can only imagine  
×
×
  • Create New...