Jump to content
SAU Community

Front Pipe + Dump Pipe (Before/After Dyno Results) - 203rwkw Stock ECU/Turbo


Recommended Posts

rev,

Where are you getting the knock sensor read out?

Doesn't the ECU ignore the knock sensor above a certain rpm?

(exact rpm cut off is load dependant)

Originally posted by rev210

I said before somewhere else there might be a little more (5-10HP maybe) I might get out for the dyno time. Dyno time is expensive and tuning the S-afc is pretty easy with the knock sensor read out.  

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by rev210

Tuning 'properly' does not necessarilly = dyno.

I agree with that....a light tune (20mins on the road) and I could feel the difference....I prefer response moreso than top end power, esp since it's my daily driver :)

Originally posted by SlowGTS-t

I'd be worried about how the A/F ratio gets leaner with more boost, I'd say that the injectors are pretty much maxed out or something.  

12.0:1 is a bit on the lean side for a daily driver...

12.0 is fine or a daily driver if u use 98 RON!

on stock fuel pump and injectors with a s-afc u need to have the setting - 12% or so to get that a/f ratio, so theres plenty left in the fuel pump and injectors

Hi guys, let me work this out....

Benm's car was 203 rwkw, that's about 270 rwhp, which is around 350 bhp (260 kw).

Compared to a standard R33 GTST which is 135 rwkw, that's about 180 rwhp, which is around 250 bhp (185 kw). Close enough.

So an extra 5 lbs of boost (7 to 12), a FMIC, pod and a full exhaust made an extra 90 rwhp (68 rwkw). Better still, at standard boost, the FMIC, exhaust and pod made 67 rwhp (50 rwkw).

And the A/F ratios sit between 11.8 and 12.2 to 1 from 5,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm. It would take me a couple of hours on the dyno with the PFC to get them that great.

That's a pretty damn good result I'd say, gotta get me one of those '95 model ECU's.

Have to agree with Rev here - after sticking in a S-AFC and spending about half an hour looking like a #$%^head on the freeway and other main(ish) roads, you can tune these things pretty darn well.

A very noticeable difference, but mostly more "driveable" power, which when you face it is what most of us really want. squeezing those extra few kW while wringing its neck at 7000rpm is all well and good, but i think you can get a decent result without jumping on the dyno.

p.s. i want that ECU!!

/me waits for the slashing to start

23710-21U60

MEC-K620

A2-5322

(Click here to see a pic)

Sorry about the quality I dont know how to use my camera yet (Geeze c'mon i've only had it for 6mths)

:uh-huh:

Originally posted by benm

23710-21U60

MEC-K620

A2-5322

I think that'd be a R620, not a K620. Fuzzy pic ;)

Here's a link to all the ECU types. You'll have to dump the URL into Babelfish to do the translations though :)

http://www.grid.co.jp/prod/rom/map.htm

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr

I 'think' they are listed in date order and order of manufacture??

And another link for other ECU's, with this one you'll have to jump between babelfish and normal cause it stuffs up the formating....

http://www.grid.co.jp/DAT/unitdat.txt

I suppose we won't really know what's going on with the ECU's until we do a direct comparison on the same car :)

J

Originally posted by ed

how often do you get up to 6 grand on a daily driver?

heheheh Daily of course :)

I guess what I'm saying is that running that lean doesnt give much allowance for things like bad fuel, blocked fuel filters, anything else, maybe even hot days.

Question. Should a car run leaner if you put more boost on?

comparing your dyno figures will be a waste of time unless everyone's is run on shootout mode! my mates 300tt made just over 200rwkw on shootout mode then a couple of months later put C.E.S 3" twin dump pipes on it (still had std front just cat back setup) & only made 209rwkw on the normal tuning mode! From what i have seen of the shootout mode it is abit generous!

I can't really see the argument your making here ?

Same Dyno

Same Tuners

Same Mode

Very similar day (temperature)

This thread was to compare the before/after of fitting a frontpipe so i think its totally fine regardless of whether it was in shootout mode or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...