Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Fellas,

I'm toying with the idea of going all in and putting my funds for the next few years into a skyline. I'm currently full time at uni with 3 years to go, so money is a pretty significant issue.

My first choice would be to pick up a manual r34 GT-T for around $25k (which should be possible with some hunting, according to my research). However, that would take up pretty much all my cash (plus insurance of $2k quoted by Just Car). So I'm wondering how the running costs for an r34 GT-T, as compared to my current "car" (2000 CE Lancer 1.8 manual), ignoring the obvious fact of fuel consumption? Services would be more expensive, of course (substantially?), but am I liable to be hit with many other costs? I'd intend buy it stock and keep it that way (for the time being), and use it as a daily driver with no track work etc.

Alternately, how would that compare to say a '96 or '97 r33 GTS-25T which I'd be aiming to put around $18k into? Would the running costs be significantly more for the r33 (older car, more liable to breakdown etc), or similar? In the long term would it still be a cheaper option?

I should probably point out that I have little to no mechanical expertise, though I'm willing to learn to keep everything running smoothly.

Thanks for the input!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106217-running-costs-v-purchase-price/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that running costs between a GTT and late model GTST would differ that much, provided both are in decent condition. I even find that servicing my Skyline only costs marginally more than a non-imported car (mainly because I use premium fluids).

If it's a near-stock daily driver, shouldn't have any major problems.

Both cost about the same to run, generally you wouldnt be breaking things as much in the R34, but you never know.

You'll get almost the same fuel economy, and roughly similar costs for insurance.

But going from a lancer to this, you are going to be so so broke on petrol costs. $20 used to get me a weeks worth of driving in my old car, now its like $70, and for a struggling student, tough!

Not to mention if things start breaking, your in for it! parts are pretty expensive and hard to come by. Then you have things like tyres, brake pads the usual maintenence stuff.

And I said I was gonna keep the car stock after i got it, that doesnt really last for long. You'll be itching to spend even more money on it! hahah

Nonetheless i say go for it, itll make you happy, but broke! I dont regret getting mine.

I've had my GTT for a year next month. kept it stock all this while, the only costs I have outlayed is in replacing an O2 sensor plus ur normal 5000k services which is oil, filter. I've driven more than 30,000ks over the past year in it and had no problems at all whatsoever *touch wood* I guess all it comes down to is age and condition. newer car less things break if maintained regularly. older car would have more wear and tear, replacing parts can be a pain and that is where most of the costs would be incurred. I don't see any difference in maintainece costs compared to a lancer except with turbo cars u will need to do oil changes more regularly.

Jesus thats alot of millage! i will of had my GT-t a year as of march 6th. And the only thing i've spent money on has been one service, but i changed all the gearbox and diff oil to redline. and it hasn't cost me that much to run really.

Where do they sell these cheap R34s. I would love to get one that cheap. Insurance wise, I found the cheapest to be Suncorp but I suppose it depends on your age. I just got spark plugs for my car and they were $25 each X 6.

R34's have dropped in place dramatically in the past 6 months or so. I payed about 32,000 for mine this time last year and now would be lucky to get 27,000 or so. I'd take 25,000 if i was selling it (but thats never gonna happen in my lifetime)

Thanks for the input guys - I feel more and more tempted! Looking at R34s though, it seems that the autos are a lot easier to get at the lower price - I'm more of a manual guy, though, as I like the extra control it affords. I realise that the autos are tiptronic, but how agressively can they be driven? I remember driving a tiptronic Liberty GT, and while the power was certainly all there, it felt like I was being "babied" thru the gears, particularly at the lower RPMs, and the gear changes seemed to take forever - am I likely to have similar experience in the R34?

(Yeah, I know, I should just test drive one, but I won't have an opportunity til next week so I figure I may as well as ask you guys :lol: )

There won't be much difference, till you stack the R34.. then you're f**ked.. as panels, headlights, etc are near impossible to come by, and will cost you a pretty penny.

I just got spark plugs for my car and they were $25 each X 6.

sorry.. but you got ripped off.. You can get a full set of coppers for $25 the set, and they would have done exactly the same thing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...