Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First thing to check. did you renew any of the rear steering arms when you fitted the hicas rack - I presume you fitted the old arms to the hicas lock bar. If you did then do the following...

Jack up the rear of the car to get wheels in air, support on stands and then grab the wheel at a quarter-to-three, try to move the wheel(as the rear steering would have). If you have any movement at ALL then you will most likely need the bushes in the rear hub replaced and the rear steering arms too.

I had Fulcrum at Rocklea do mine in my GTS4 and a mates GTR, they did a pretty good job plus they now have jigs to fit the bushes from doing my car.

Also check that the rear subframe bushes aren't stuffed, the ones behind the doors are silicone filled and the ones near the spare tyre well are solid rubber. The solid ones don't normally cause a problem, just the front ones - which Noltec make.

Good luck

Edited by gts4diehard
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106288-r32/#findComment-1966692
Share on other sites

yeah i replace the arms with new ones when did the lock bar they looked a little sused ime thinking its the front bushes it looks like there is marks from where the subframe has been hitting the chassis rail any one out there who can help with this

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106288-r32/#findComment-1969365
Share on other sites

yeah i replace the arms with new ones when did the lock bar they looked a little sused ime thinking its the front bushes it looks like there is marks from where the subframe has been hitting the chassis rail any one out there who can help with this

Get a big screw driver and lever the subframe around, if it moves then you have a problem. Look at the 4 main subframe to chassis mounting bushes, they are filled with silicone. Make sure none iof them is leaking.

They are marked with green dots in the attached picture;

R34_GT_R_Rear_Suspension.jpg

If the bushes are stuffed you can either replace them with polyuretthane bushes, Nismo harder rubber and alloy. This is a big job as the subframe has to be removed from the car. A less expenive (DIY) job is to fit a set of Whiteline rear subframe bushes (AKA pineapples), to supprt the damaged standard bushes. They are around $115 and can be fitted in 20 minutes.

;) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106288-r32/#findComment-1970558
Share on other sites

anyone out thee have solid urathane mounts in there 32 and can let me know whats it like getting conflicting storiesone suse told me that its that harsh i wont be able to even see out the mirrors

even more cool is if someone in brisie has this done can take me for a spin just to ease the questions any help much appricated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106288-r32/#findComment-1981943
Share on other sites

Most of the guys with rear subframe bush issues simply add the Whiteline rear subframe alignment kit (pineapples)for ~$115. It is a 20 minute DIY and doesn't add very much NVH at all ie; most people don't even notice it. Much easier and cheaper than removing the whiole rear subframe and pushing out the standard bushes.

:biggrin: cheers :biggrin:

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106288-r32/#findComment-1982478
Share on other sites

Most of the guys with rear subframe bush issues simply add the Whiteline rear subframe alignment kit (pineapples)for ~$115. It is a 20 minute DIY and doesn't add very much NVH at all ie; most people don't even notice it. Much easier and cheaper than removing the whiole rear subframe and pushing out the standard bushes.

:biggrin: cheers :biggrin:

but what if the std bushes a f**ked

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106288-r32/#findComment-1982512
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...