Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes i tend to agree, my ECU was tuned by a local tuner. I did ask him to go easy as I want to be on the safe side.. I would however like to go further than 6800RPM my japanese cutoff was set at 8200RPM I still wonder how comme my 400 injectors lean out, or is it the tuning/turbo.. I wanna start downloading ecu .bin soon enough to see how my fuel map is..

And yeah 94 octane gas is as good as it gets here but I've seen/read that 94 here is about like 98 japanese octane...

is running that rich leaning out my injectors when I pump the boost up?

What sort of fuel pump are you using?

Unless you fuel pump is capable to flowing enough fuel to hold solid rail pressure at higher injector dudty cycle you will see it start to lean out.

Also if u are using the stock afm that may cause a problem as it may be maxing out aswell.

Increasing timing wont reduce your boost threshold. In fact It will do the opposite. There is a big compromise here between lag and power.

So if you actually run very retarded timing it can cause the fuel mix to burn very late while leaving the cylinder and hence a sort of antilag?

Hmmmmmmmm I can see how this would work.

i doubt it, antilag works by adding extra fuel in to burn in the manifold and thus give extra exhaust gasses. changing timing enough will just cause a late burning of the mixture but its still the same amount of air/fuel, so still pumping out the same amount of exhaust gasses, just burning later

maybe the higher EGT's will help though

Edited by mokompri

RedDrifter I have

-440 Injectors

-Z32 MAF

-GTR Fuel pump

-GTR intercooler

-2.2L Tomei engine Derive I

I didn't have a boost gauge when the guy ran the dyno so I do not know if it's the boost that drops above 6800.. I'll repost my graph here to help you guys

dynorun3.jpg

You can see the A/F leaning around 6800...

Edited by klys
So if you actually run very retarded timing it can cause the fuel mix to burn very late while leaving the cylinder and hence a sort of antilag?

Hmmmmmmmm I can see how this would work.

Yes, thats exactly correct, problem is that you will have heaps of boost but very little power, hence the compromise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
×
×
  • Create New...