Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Has anyone out there has any experience with the above 2 tyres? Have searched the forum and nothing specific has really come up regarding these 2. Very mixed opinions. Extremely lost. Have also heard about Hankook Ventus 104's, how do these compare?

I'm particularly concerned about wet weather handling.

It's for a R33 GST 235//45/17

Currently on BF Goodrich G Force Sports. Not impressed at all especially in the wet. Car seems very twitchy especially in the wet or at high speeds.

I've heard good things about the Federal SS595 but mainly on 4wd's. Other's bag them out as cheap tyres... which they are.

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106756-help-federal-ss595-vs-dunlop-3000a/
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

Has anyone out there has any experience with the above 2 tyres? Have searched the forum and nothing specific has really come up regarding these 2. Very mixed opinions. Extremely lost. Have also heard about Hankook Ventus 104's, how do these compare?

I'm particularly concerned about wet weather handling.

It's for a R33 GST 235//45/17

Currently on BF Goodrich G Force Sports. Not impressed at all especially in the wet. Car seems very twitchy especially in the wet or at high speeds.

I've heard good things about the Federal SS595 but mainly on 4wd's. Other's bag them out as cheap tyres... which they are.

Thanks in advance.

Hi

I have been using SS595s on an R32 GTR for around 6,000km and have found them to provide grip well above my ability. What I mean is that in 2nd gear around a tight hill bend they may squeak just a little but for every other corner I have driven as fast as comfortable and they haven't let me down. I drive up and down a 3km windy mountain stretch each day.

As far as wet performance goes, they perform almost as well as in the dry, which is to be expected, however I don't push things in the wet too often so can't really offer any terribly constructive. Suffice to say they feel steady at highway speeds. When the car finally makes it onto a skid pan, I'll have more to say! :)

Yes they are cheap tyres but until they're the reason I can't take a corner any faster, then I'll buy something more expensive (which may or may not do the job). Until then, I need to drive better! ;)

SS595s were my second choice - originally tried to buy K104s but there were major delays caused by the Australian importer (or distributor).

Cheers!

Mark

My car had federals on when I got it - not sure which type, but they were pretty crap. One bulged and had to be replaced, they used to bag up in first gear at about 25km/h if you stomped it (at 10psi boost) and they aquaplaned better than water skis (got 26000km out of them). Dunlop 3000a's were miles ahead, didn't break traction like the others and actually drove through puddles. Could launch at about 1000rpm more than the federals - heaps better grip. Got 34000km out of them. This was on an R33 GTS-T, hope that helps!

I have used the Federals and the ventus 104s, along with a few of my mates, we now use the federals as they grip A LOT better than the ventus 104 and are a fair bit cheaper.

I have had several sets of the federals and never had any problems with dodgy tyres.

Look at the GTR that runs 9 sec 1/4 mile on the federal ss595 tyres.......... they do have amazing grip wet and dry.

You have run the SS595 sky30?

I'm getting close to a new set of tyres..

EDIT: I might stick with not so sticky tyres until I get this fragile rb20t box out. :S

I have had about 4-5 sets of federal ss595, and so have a couple of mates, you cant beat the grip they provide at the cheap price. They dont seem t wear any quicker than any other tyre ive used, but when you have 300+rwkw tyres seem to dissappear fast.

I am running federal ss595 and am happy.

I think they have great grip but am guessing they might wear fairly quick as the rubber feels soft.

Soft and grippy.

mine have done like 15,000kms and 4 trackdays and still have tread

they are definately good value, but i nothing exceptional :)

I drive on some pretty hard tyres in the wet, simex are rock hard tyres that are non-drectional and are extremely bad in the wet.

I was curious how you couldn't feel it? Hence the reason for the road surface quiz. :)

Sorry Cubes, feel what...? It was literally modest acceleration on a large radius roundabout - exiting actually which is even more surprising because the thing was just about pointing straight - and although I take your point re road surface we're talking about very modest levels of power etc and in third gear. Granted they have lttle weight over the rear axle but they are also quite well balanced normally. I've driven an early model also and it stuck like glue. This was an 05. You usually get some response to the level of correction you provide no matter how bad the surface but the way the thing behaved was like it was on ice or oil, which is not my experience with handling behaviour even in sudden heavy downpours irrespective of road surface or vehicle. I've driven on all types of surfaces all over Australia in all conditions in a lot of different vehilces for different reasons and this was definately close to a 'lose'.

That said, it doesn't mean I didn't get caught out but I've recently heard that the MX5 and S2000 are two of the most tyre sensitive cars out there. I guess it was just consistent with previous experiences where tyres have been the cause.

Cheers

Edited by Scooby

With my federal ss 595's 17/255's only on the rear of the car.

They have suvived a few burnouts,numerous drifting antics,a track day,a skid pan day and regular street driving and still have tread on them.Even if below 40%

I attribute allot of this to having nice even tyre wear from the rear camber kit.

I mean i cant comment from having ever driven a car with good tryes long enough to make an educated guess as to what was the best value tyre for money.But,going from my dads car and his bridgestone potenzas and their wear after only 1 track day with regular street driving,they are holding up quite well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...