Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

rb30 crank = shit according to the man building gtr-700 atm at croydon...iono if he wants me to spend 6-8g on a hks crank tho..

could be trying to get me to spend a bit...he said 26 crank is way better

Edited by thizzle

and why is revving higher a good thing? more fricton, more heat, more stress

you dont need to rev the rb30 to 8 grand, thats the point of it.

you can make more power at less rpm, the ideal combination

Go drag your knuckles eleswhere barbarians. Take your slow revving tractor engines, grab your straw hats and flanno shirts and go tractor pulling...push over a few cows while your at it.

The RB30 has never won anything. The RB20 won the ATCC :starwars:

Other then rego and cost, is there a disadvantage...Oh Nissan didnt give it us as a std motor :)

Haha groundhog day for sure. Hey 2BNVS who built your engine if you dont mind me asking? I've been interested in one for a while now, just looking for someone who knows what they are doing and some prices.

Edited by Freeman
Go drag your knuckles eleswhere barbarians. Take your slow revving tractor engines, grab your straw hats and flanno shirts and go tractor pulling...push over a few cows while your at it.

ahhaha nice call, who calls 7000rpm high revving anyway, my vs commo almost does that :)

go the high revving engines anyday personally, much more fun when planting out of corners and its hitting the limiter almost str8 away at 9000rpm+ :tongue:

checkout the supra vs mines gtr video and compare the revvy nature, and response/speed the rb26 hits redline compared to the supra 3L, no comparision ;)

sports engine vs torquey engine.

revs rule :(

yes revs rule so throw away these RB motors and fit a motorbike engine!!!! :yes:

Aaaaand (for Roy) there are plenty more bike engines with far more winning pedigree than any rb motor :P

RB20s do suck. I was in a a car with an L28 and it would blow the doors off my car, how old are they again. :confused:

I often wonder what the R32 GTSR would have been like if Nissan didnt invest so much money in the GTR to go Touring Car racing. Would it have had the GTR panels (alloy) with an evolution of the RB20, ie the GTRs solid lifters,6 throttle bodies etc? And kept it rwd to be in line with earlier Nissans which were light, mid power cars... Its a shame they built the thing to go Grp A racing, as i understand that if the capacity had exceeded 2.6L then it woudl have meant either a boost restriction or weight penalty...thats from a grey memory so dotn quote me on that.

I sit back and wait for the new GTR, a car that Nissan/Renaoult are building for a market, not racing. I suspect of the R32 wasnt for racing it would have used an engine bigger then 2.6L

As for talk about RB30s beign truck engines, its kinda funny. You look at M3s, some of the greatest 6 cylinder engiens gettign aroubnd, you read the reviews of its revvy nature etc...yet ppl seem to think dynamically the RB30 cant rev ????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...