Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I too tend to believe that they must have been wound back. All the cars in a yard seem to have very similar readings.

I picked one with very little wear on seats, pedals etc. It was also stock, so any mods and racing will only have been done by the Aussie owner.

When taking my car home the odometer was working only intermittently.

I took it back to the yard and they agreed to fix it. I argued that it was not possible to know exactly how many K's it had done and they also agreed to do my timing belt etc well before the 100K it was due.

A good result in the end.

I got my 1993 @ 32,000kms last year with very clean condition. Engine is luckily good as ICE inspected it during last service, but they said it might have been wound back either here or in Japan, as the timing belt is already starting to sag, possibly the actual km is 80,000km or so, but the mechanical and interior conditions are still very good. Possibly owned by a lady or family man in japan who don't trash their car (finger cross)...

So anyway I had the timing belt replaced at last service 46,000km just to be 100% safe... just in case it is really wound back. My new manual speedo starts at 48,000km (I had auto to manual gearbox conversion) so I'm actually "loosing" 2,000 km or so but at the combination of age and km, I can't be bother to wind it back to 46,000 km same as when I replace it.

If your car still drives nice, enjoy it...

Oh, and by the way, my mom in Indonesia had a 1998 Toyota Corolla and it only ran a genuine 8,891km because she did not use it a lot. I can guarantee this because she bought it brand spanking new from the dealer in 1998. That's only an average of 1,700km a year and not unusual there.

Since I bought my skyline, I had travelled 14,000km in it (32K to 46K) within 10 months (March 02 - Jan 03).

Maybe you guys wanna start importing 2nd hand cars from sth east asia instead of Japan?

HOWEVER price might be a deterrent factor as a 2003 model Camry cost Rp.400,000,000 (yes, digits are correct) which is close to $75,000 for a entry level 4-cylinder model. Here they cost only $26,990 for the same 4-pot stirrer. Most of it is the 200% import tax (300% if you import as built-up not knock down components), not sure if you can get a refund on that if you re-export the car, but I don't think so.

If your looking at buying and are weary of the odo things to look for are if the numbers line up on the odo. You may find the at the third number from the right for example is lower than the rest sitting at level.

Just something I picked up on. Anyhow I'd rather buy a car with 120K on the clock than 30K of the same vintage. May have been sitting in bumper to bumper most of it's life......

Yeah

My Wife's Aunty has a 91 Pintara bought new. It now has 29,000 genuine Kilometers on it.

I would not buy this car in a million years as it just sits in the garage (Been thru at least 4 batteries). Never had fuel filter changed or trans oil etc in all this time.

Would definitely blow it up first time I drove it. Low K's ain't necessarily what it's cracked up to be, especially if the car is not maintained properly. The fluids do go off etc.

Love your 'Line if it does what you want it to regardless of KM's!!

Another thought. I think they look after them well in Jap because of the laws etc.

like you guys said the only way you can tell is from the outisde of the car and most importantly the inside of the car

seats steering wheel dash console pedals etc

thats what i belive in i belive if the inside preety well and the outside preety good you "should" have a good car

Yeah mine was definately wound back - but done on aus ground by private owner - why im not sure because it should have round 104,000 on clock for aug 02 and for a 94 model i would believe this to be spot on. But im really stumped as to why private owner would do it - guess i'll never know - cant complain my car is in good nick havent had any probs its just a shame that they cant leave things be - its more useful to us knowing what kms a car has done so we can get things like belts etc changed on time!

funny thing is I'm really sceptical about klms and well my car when I bought it had 63000 klmI never believed the klms until my mechanic who does a lot of work for car yard inspected it and his comment was the klms are genuine why because of the condition of the car in generall and the underbody of the car etc. some are low some are high just make sure your interior is is good nick that tells the story

meggala

well i just got back from mondo motors on warrigal road, felt like going down and having a bit of a look at their cars and this thread got me interested in the klms on some imports....so i went down to have a look..

well well they must think we are stupid or something!!! i mean for goodness sakes....

heres an example there was a purple 95 vspec down their with apparently only approx 42k on the clock. The steering wheel was so warn it wasnt funny actually i dont think ive seen a steering wheel as warn as this one, there where scratches all around the lock on the driver side the front bar was pretty chipped and the dash was a little untidy here and there and there were a few more scratches around the car... it did not look like it had only done 42k...

i was shocked

mine's got 158k on the clock now - 52k when i bought it.

It wouldnt surprise me if it was over the 200k mark now.

But all is good - still goin strong, also considering my motor's

an NA engine with a turbo bolted on. Kinda shows how good

rb engines actually are really.

although, funny how all the late r34s i see seem to have approx (and probably genuine) 20-40k

but the 32s and 33s seem to have the same. Did everyone in

Japan recently start driving more in the last 5 yrs?

Strange days indeed...

I'd say just removing the dial on a digital would reset it, either that or there is an internal battery to remove.

crooser.. good to see yours is going strong after 158,000km!

While i assume the turbo will reduce the life a fair bit off an RB25, RB30's can get 400,000km out of them

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...