Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Which link?? Mud posted 2 in his initial post...

The first one will not work if you are NOT a member of SAu Qld.

The second one will work for forum members that want to find out about becoming a member of the SAu Qld Club.

If you can't get the second link working for whatever reason and you want to become a member of SAu Qld, you are welcome to send me a PM.

Regards,

Karen

nup, tried that 3 times lol.....

just keeps going to that error page... ohwell another cruise i will miss out on..

im meant to bne a qld member, paid membership and got the membership pack :(

thanks Karen

,, its all good now.

You're welcome :O

hmm,, i will have to miss out this one,, i dont really wanna drive out to toowoomba....

Is this why people are not coming along...because the cruise is to Toowoomba?

Is it too far away or not cool or what's the issue here? If people say why, then the destination can quite easily be altered (I know it's only a few days away, but to date there has been no objections to the destination). Let us know...please!!!

:dry:

I think its a good destination but for me the fuel bill would be high plus the feeding frenzy of the cops on that road is a deterent as well (Its a mildly dangerous road in places and they should be doing it).

I travel to the Gold coast once a weekend to visit family and this cruise counts me out if you plan to go to Hinze or Canungra etc I'll be in.

Nobody seemed to make a fuss when it was first posted, so I don't understand the issue now...

On another note, we're gonna be in Kinga for the weekend, but we're gonna detour on our way home, & meet you guys in Toowoomba on the day.

Anna xoxo

I am just not really into the cruising thing like I used to be. . . . . sorry.

And I have a person coming from Sydney to pickup the mini I sold so I am kinda stuck with that Sunday and to sound testing at Mt Cotton Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...