Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so basically it is possible to use if you re wire it in and re-map the ECU to use it, similar to a Z32 on rb20..

where as a S1 AFM would be direct plug in replacement, but would still need a re-mapped ecu ??

No need to remap, they both have the same 0-5V output per same gm/air sec entering engine.

Re-wire to suit and its apples :down:

You only need to remap if you change to a Z32/Q45 AFM as these read less Volts per gm/air entering engine.

Edited by RB30-POWER

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

there shouldn't be any difference in them at all as they are both 80mm..??

but i swear i read somewhere that the rb20 items cant handle as much power as a rb25 item.

Craved, the r33 s1 and r32 afm's are most definitely the same.

From observations the R33 and R32 PowerFC airflow curves do vary slightly.

It appear the r33 airflow curve returns a higher load/airflow for a given afm voltage. SO possibly this is where you may see r33's making the same power as r32's on the same afm voltage.

I'm not completely sure what directly affects the airflow curve, maybe engine efficiency.. I have no idea.

The rb20/25 afm's have different airflow curves in the s13/s14 pfc's also.. Go figure.. :( I have no idea why.

so theoretically if the R33 afm shows the same voltage for a higher air flow through it, that would mean that if you swapped the AFM's the RB20 would run leaner without changing anything.

doesn't sound nice if i have read what you said correctly Joel.

No... :(

The airflow curves are located within the ecu. So the physical afm, there is ZERO difference.

All ECU's contain different airflow curves for a given afm.

So the same afm on different ecu's will return a slightly different load value. As previously said I am not sure why the airflow curves are different UNLESS it has some thing to do with engine efficiency. No idea. :(

I shouldn't have gone so in depth, only confuses. :(

I've had both afm's on the dyno on my R32 RB20DET many years ago. There was no difference. Exactly 100% the same afr ratios. :)

hmmm, so afr's are still the same, and all I need to do is rewire?

Now that I can do.

If/when I do it, I'll post up some pics.

(If engine blows up, I will come looking for cubes and kill him... :( )

:(

if they run the sam voltages, there isn't really any reason to upgrade then is there..

I wasn't under the impression the guy was looking to upgrade, more so just replace a faulty AFM with another he had lieing around.

hehe i hadn't spoken to wil about why he was doing it, i sort of hijacked it a little to see if there is an other reason to change them over for power gains.. while still getting his question answered

this is only since i was under the impression that the rb20 afm was only good for about 200rwkw, then rb25 was 250ish rwkw then 300+ for the z32 ..

there'd be no difference between the r32 one and the series1 afm, as they are the same unit.. the only difference is the s2 one as per above.

where they actually run out of resolution and effectively the power they can make may be different because of the different head flow between the rb20 and rb25 heads. Thats why people probably come to the conclusion they make different power, therefore they are different.. no the afm is the same, the engines are different :mad:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...