Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just a quicky and not sure if it should be in this section but here goes, im doing some work on my motor and i have been asked if i would like to put a sump extension on the RB to hold more oil, the car will be seeing some track work and i am getting this at a good price so are there any cons to doing this mod. all i really know is that we gonna need to cut my original sump and weld the aftermarket one on.

thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110090-rb26-sump-extention/
Share on other sites

My concern with the simple weld on extension kits (Trust, Tomei etc) is that they hang quite low. If your car R already has lowered suspension, there is a real risk of sump damage on speed humps and curbs.

I went for the Hi Octane sump as shown below

IMG_00441.jpg

Expensive but very well made and better clearance and capacity than the weld on kits.

Edited by Gav

Gav's sump is through Hi Octane Racing and are built by Performance Metalcraft (I've got one too).

Interior has windage doors made from metal plate and are exceptionally well made. Cost (by the time you add freight etc) is close to $2K. I had been running a Tomei kit along with an Accusump and gallery restrictor plug and recently spun bearings.

From what I have been told, many of the off the shelf articles are great for street but are not designed for track - and cannot cope. I had considered getting someone else to make the sump extension (a little cheaper) but these guys have been doing this for some time and have been through the experimentation phase already. The sumps they build are supposed to be as good as you can get prior to going to a dry sump. Capacity goes to about 8 litres for the GTR. Engine is going back together now so I'll get to try it out before too long.

thanks mac, they do look the business that's for sure. hell of a price tag though, but if you have say a $20K build (which i'd say Gav is and then some) then i guess it's relatively cheap insurance.

modified head or not?

Yes, head has been ported and polished with full bench testing, Tomei Poncams and gears

thanks mac, they do look the business that's for sure. hell of a price tag though, but if you have say a $20K build (which i'd say Gav is and then some) then i guess it's relatively cheap insurance.

Especially at the moment. Scored the journals on the cranks which meant I needed a new one - trouble is, Nissan ran out of GTR cranks in November and no-one yet knows when thay are going to start making any more. No doubt they will, but when. I waited 6 weeks and finally found one through a GTR forum in the UK. Aparently these are the SH1T!!

Yes, head has been ported and polished with full bench testing, Tomei Poncams and gears

I think he meant modified the cylinder head for increased oil return to the sump. We drill the oil return galleries and smooth the oil flow passages with the die grinder. Plus we fit an external oil return from the rear of cylinder head direct to the sump. Add this to the oil restriction (one feed restricted and one blocked off) in the top of the block and you have a good chance of the oil staying in the sump, not being trapped in the cylinder head. Or filling up your catch can.

TIP; If ordering the sump from Performance Metalcraft make sure you specify a fitting for an oil temperature sensor. Plus a fitting for the external oil return hose into the top of the LHS wing.

:P Cheers :P

I think he meant modified the cylinder head for increased oil return to the sump. We drill the oil return galleries and smooth the oil flow passages with the die grinder. Plus we fit an external oil return from the rear of cylinder head direct to the sump. Add this to the oil restriction (one feed restricted and one blocked off) in the top of the block and you have a good chance of the oil staying in the sump, not being trapped in the cylinder head. Or filling up your catch can.

Thats what i was getting at... a stock head, expect to spin a bearing or two.

The sump is a band-aid solution (and more costly aswell) if you are still using an un-modified head.

Just woke up and checked the thread (we're 9 hours behind in Bulgaria - physically and figuratively speaking).

OK - below is a pic of the internal swing gates. Note the hinges (gates) only swing internally both laterally (retaining oil level around the pickup on corners) and at the rear (for hard acceleration).

DSCF0841.JPG

My last custom sump (made localy in Perth) failed at the welds and the gates weren't as good quality and reliable.

Edited by Gav

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...