Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello,

i am looking for a rouph map of people that run an RB25 with ~500 hp ( =~ 367kw -> ~330rwkw) ... this is my setup:

stock rebuilt engine

PFC PRO w/HC

550cc

FMIC with 2.5" piping

Full 3" exhaust

z32 AFM

T4 Turbo

upgraded plugs

upgraded pump and fuel filter

HKS air filter

twin plate clutch

would be great if some1 could send me a map that is running well and producing this kind of power, because I can take it from there and edit it using my wideband O2 and dyno to make it perfect...

thanks!

nico

ps: my email is [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110597-does-any1-have-a-pfc-map-for-rb25/
Share on other sites

hello,

i am looking for a rouph map of people that run an RB25 with ~500 hp ( =~ 367kw -> ~330rwkw) ... this is my setup:

stock rebuilt engine

PFC PRO w/HC

550cc

FMIC with 2.5" piping

Full 3" exhaust

z32 AFM

T4 Turbo

upgraded plugs

upgraded pump and fuel filter

HKS air filter

twin plate clutch

would be great if some1 could send me a map that is running well and producing this kind of power, because I can take it from there and edit it using my wideband O2 and dyno to make it perfect...

thanks!

nico

ps: my email is [email protected]

yeah. ive got some maps for z32 and 2530. no quite that spec but its a hell of a lot better than the planejane stock powerfc maps. il attach them tonite as xls's.

ive tuned SR20 with 2530 and gt-rs with various injector sizes aswell. several rb25 maps in various states. and 4 or 5 rb26 maps aswell in various states of tune with diferent turbos and fuel systems.

ok. a few questions.

- is your fuel pressure set correctly ?

- is your ignition timing set ?

- what cams are you using?

bare in mind these maps will get you into the ballpark as goes fuel map settings and full load ignition.

Edited by no_name

it would just be quicker and probably easier and safer to just tune it from scratch rather than loading someone else's map. also you are (or aim to be) well beyond the limits for stock internals, hope it doesnt go bang.

What do you mean by stock rebuilt engine?

Did you use forgies, race bearings, etc, with stock compression and std head.

OR

Did you rebuild it with stock pistons, etc.

Hopefully you rebuilt it properly, otherwise you will be soon due for another build, with that power.

man, u guys need to have more faith into our engines :D ... fact is that they are RB (RACE Breed :) ), have I-6 and are 2.5l and are turbo engines with a very strong iron block... i was recently reading on here a thread where a guy is pushing his stock RB25 close to the 500hp border or so...

i have seen maany BMW 525i with STOCK I-6, NON-turbo engines with same displacement running 500hp and are still holding together after 1+ year of racing every weekend...

my engine rebuild included stock bearings, stock new piston rings, etc... the only modded part is the 1.6mm head gasket to lower compression a bit... unfortunatley, the cams will be the limiting factors, but i hope to get some poncams soonish...

@no_name:

hmm... fuel pressure is slightly higher than stock due to z32 fuel filter and upgraded fuel pump

ignition i recently set using this round thing (dont know the name in english) that is on the crank

cams are unfortunately still stock :D

thanks!

nico

ps: what a funny smilie :P

EDIT - just wanted to also mention that the great advantage of the RB its short stroke is which can allow reasonably high HP figures, with minimized risk of bending a rod a easily...

and also, i think that the RB25 can hold 500hp, if tuned properly and i anyway have holidays soon, and plently of time to make that wideband and dyno pay off :yes:

Edited by T-u-R-b-O

research how much power people here are running on stock rb25's. it's possible 280-300kw may not last you very long at all, let alone 330kw.

comparing a bmw inline 6 race engine (for it to have 500hp, i'd suggest just a little work may have been done to it) with a stock rb25 is not relative. saying that because they have the same displacement and capacity so therefore they are comparable, is kinda like me saying i have two arms and legs so therefore would be able to hold my own in a boxing ring with mike tyson.

my suggestion would be to go and get a professional tune, and have a chat with a tuner who really knows the limits of your engine and setup. the couple of hundred bucks could save you a lot of money and pain in the long run.

hmm... i did research and people like LNEMUP are running these sort of figures... its only been a recent tune in his case, but there where others (on nicoclub for example) which have been running between 450-500 hp for a long while already without blowing the stock bottom end...

but come on man, i had a CA18DET with just cosmetic mods running 304 hp and that on only a 1.8l 4 cylinder engine... so i am sure that the RB25 can take that extra 150-200 hp without getting hurt in the long time...

but hey, i am just looking for a map, and not to discuss this topic... i will go through with it, but I still thank for your advice... :yes:

i dont mind whether the map is for an RB25 with forged or not forged bottom end, as long its in the 450-500 hp area, and running simular setup to mine (550cc, z32 afm, t3/t4 etc) ...

Noooo_naaame, where are yoou? :woot:

:thanks:

nico

ps: how did u come up with "comparing a bmw inline 6 race engine"?? the 525i engine has nothing to do with racing? here they just tune it up, cause its dirty cheap to get a new one cause we have so many... the M Power series on the other hand could be considered an atmospheric race engine... :yes:

then i would have to answer with the question what makes the GTR engine soo much better and stronger than an RB25 :woot: ... i have researched this on forums all over the world for a long time by now and have found out on several occasions that it cant be because of the minimal difference of displacement, nor can it be the rods cause i have seen comparison pictures and read reports on the differences of rods, and there is no significant difference... possibly the pistons could be slightly better and maybe the head of the 26 can flow slightly more, but does that make it resist soo more HP and punishment??

but that doesnt matter, since i am on the lookout for a goood map :thanks:

nico

ps: how did u come up with "comparing a bmw inline 6 race engine"?? the 525i engine has nothing to do with racing?

i didn't come up with it -

i have seen maany BMW 525i with STOCK I-6 , NON-turbo engines with same displacement running 500hp and are still holding together after 1+ year of racing every weekend...

:thanks: cheers mate, all the best

then i would have to answer with the question what makes the GTR engine soo much better and stronger than an RB25 :P ... i have researched this on forums all over the world for a long time by now and have found out on several occasions that it cant be because of the minimal difference of displacement, nor can it be the rods cause i have seen comparison pictures and read reports on the differences of rods, and there is no significant difference... possibly the pistons could be slightly better and maybe the head of the 26 can flow slightly more, but does that make it resist soo more HP and punishment??

but that doesnt matter, since i am on the lookout for a goood map :D

nico

With a silly response like that, i give -up on this thread and have now un-subscribed to it.

:dry: Good luck :)

what on earth are you talking about? its nothing to do with proving anyone wrong. its basically not a good idea to share maps. i mean have mine for all i care, its on my rb25 powerfc DIY tuning thread, but that still doesnt make it a good idea. it would be quicker to tune it yourself or have someone else do it than fix or bandaid someone else's tune

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...